Disposed

FPA-21/MUM/2015 of M/s Oyster Shipmanagement Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai

ATFP23 Jan 2017FPA-21/MUM/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The appellate tribunal granted time to file a reply, noted the appellant's agreement to file separate appeals for co-appellants 2 to 32, and directed that the present appeal proceedings serve as the basis for those separate appeals.

What did the court decide?

Time granted for reply. Order made applicable to separate appeals by co-appellants 2 to 32.

FPA-21/MUM/2015 of M/s Oyster Shipmanagement Pvt. Ltd. & Ors… — Property and Title | ATFP (2017)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-78/MUM/2015 (Stay) FPA-21/MUM/2015

¶3

M/s Oyster Shipmanagement Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. Versus

¶4

… Appellant/Applicant

¶5

The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent

¶6

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶7

For the appellant	:	Ms. Kiran Jain, Advocate
For the respondent	:	Sh. Stanly Joseph, I.O
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	:	CHAIRMAN
SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA	:	MEMBER
SHRI ANAND KISHORE	:	MEMBER

ORDER

23.01.2017

FPA-21/MUM/2015

Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to file the same within three weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within two weeks thereafter.

¶12

List on 27^th March, 2017.

¶13

Thirty Two appellant have filed the single appeal. As per the earlier practice separate/independent appeals are to be filed by the appellants if the appellants impeded in single appeal have independent defense and who are not connected with each other. The learned counsel for the appellant is agreeable to file separate appeals and memo of party (except the documents) would be filed the present appeal be considered on behalf of the appellant-1 in Appeal No. FPA-21/MUM/2015. Let the same be done by the appellants 2 to 32 within four weeks from today as there is

¶14

FPA-21/MUM/2015

¶15

Page 1 of 2

¶16

no opposition on behalf of the respondent. The documents filed in the

¶17

present appeal would also be read in other appeals which are proposed to be filed on behalf of the appellant no. 2 to 32 as agreed by the parties.

¶18

List on 27^th March, 2017.

¶19

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶20

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶21

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶22

New Delhi,

¶23

23^rd January, 2017.

¶24

‘K’

¶25

FPA-21/MUM/2015

¶26

Page 2 of 2

FPA-21/MUM/2015 of M/s Oyster Shipmanagement Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-21/MUM/2015 of M/s Oyster Shipmanagement Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases