No substantive decision rendered. The Appellant was absent. The court granted a final opportunity to argue and adjourned the matter for future listing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
FPA-19/BOM/2015
Varsha Rajnikant Shah … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : |
None |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner on behalf of Competent Authority, Mumbai |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.01.2017
FPA-19/BOM/2015
The matter is listed for final disposal. Letter dated 4th January, 2017 has been received from the Competent Authority, Mumbai seeking adjournment on certain grounds.
The request is not opposed on behalf of the appellant. One final opportunity is granted to the parties to argue the appeal.
No one is present even on behalf of the appellant.
List the matter on 11th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 17th January, 2017
‘R’
FPA-19/BOM/2015
Page 1 of 1
Varsha Rajnikant Shah
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
