FPA-16/BOM/2007 of Yogesh D. Mehta v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Yogesh D. Mehta V/s The Competent Authority…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-47/Bom/2014(Rest.) FPA-16/BOM/2007
Yogesh D. Mehta … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Yogesh D. Mehta, Appellant For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
08.08.2017
FPA-16/BOM/2007
The appellant is present in person. He submits that the arguing counsel is not available as he is suffering from fever. There is no opposition to the adjournment.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yogesh D. Mehta
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court