FPA-16/BOM/2007 of Yogesh D. Mehta v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
The Appellate Tribunal granted an adjournment for the last opportunity to the appellant to argue a restoration application and appeal, which are pending in a forfeiture proceeding, subject to payment of costs.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
MP-47/BOM/2014 (Rest.)
in
FPA-16/BOM/2007
Yogesh D. Mehta … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Ranjeet K. Panyan , Advocate. For the respondent : Shri R.N. Dsouza, J.C Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 21.11.2016
MP-47/BOM/2014 (Rest.) in FPA-16/BOM/2007
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Yogesh D. Mehta
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court