The Appellate Tribunal adjourned proceedings due to the appellant's counsel being busy in the election of the Delhi High Court Bar Association. The tribunal directed both parties to file written submissions within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1155/PAT/2014 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-646/PAT/2014 Mantu Yadav Raj Kumar Yadav … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Patna … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Pawan Kumar Mittal, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 18.11.2016
MP-PMLA-1155/PAT/2014 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-646/PAT/2014
The Learned Counsel on behalf of the appellant is busy in election of Delhi High Court Bar Association Counsel appearing seeks an adjournment. Let both the parties may file the written submission within four weeks from today.
List on 3rd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 18th November, 2016 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-646/PAT/2014
Page 1 of 1
Mantu Yadav
Raj Kumar Yadav
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
