This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-235/BNG/2013 (STAY) FPA-PMLA-381/BNG/2012 Anitha Prasad
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Nikita C. Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
26.10.2016
FPA-PMLA-379/BNG/2012
An adjournment has been sought on behalf appellant. It appears
from the record that the appellant has taken many adjournments.
The counsel for the respondent opposes the adjournment. One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the appeal subject to cost of Rs.5000/-(five thousand rupees). Cost shall be paid to the Ld. Counsel for the respondent within one week.
List on 15th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 26th October, 2016 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-381/BNG/2012
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant a final opportunity to argue the appeal subject to a conditional adjournment.
Anitha Prasad
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
