Single Bench of the Appellate Tribunal allowed condonation of 54 days delay for filing appeal under PMLA. Appeal against Adjudicating Authority' s order listed for hearing on 15 February 2017.
Condonation of 54 days delay allowed; appeal listed for hearing on 15 February 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2731/KOL/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-2732/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1443/KOL/2016
Matang Singh … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rajat Bhardwaj, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 19.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2731/KOL/2016 (COD)
This is an application filed by the applicant for condonation of delay of 54 days in filing the appeal. The application is supported by medical documents in relation to the averments made in the para no. 2 to 8 of the application. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that there is no doubt that the application is supported by the medical documents. He submits that the application be decided by the Tribunal. Reading the averments made in para no. 2 to 8 in a meaningful manner, it is noticed that there is sufficient cause explaining the delay in filing the present appeal. In these circumstances, the prayer made in the application is allowed and delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of.
FPA-PMLA-1443/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 2
MP-PMLA-2732/KOL/2016 (Stay)
Issue notice. the counsel for the respondent seeks four weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 15th February, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1443/KOL/2016
The appellant has filed this appeal under section 26 of PMLA, 2002 against the order dated 9th May, 2016 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in O.C. NO. 545/2016. The counsel for the appellant submits that neither new ground has been taken in the appeal nor additional documents have been filed, in view of above, counsel for respondent says that the reply is not necessary.
List the appeal on 15th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
19th October, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1443/KOL/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether sufficient cause exists to condone a delay of 54 days in filing an appeal under section 26 of PMLA.
Whether the appeal against the order of the Adjudicating Authority merits final disposal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Matang Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
17 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
