The Appellate Tribunal allowed more time to file the rejoinder in an appeal, directing it to be filed within six weeks by 1st November, 2016. The reply to the appeal had not been filed.
Time granted to file rejoinder of appeal within six weeks by 1st November, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2573/DLI/2016 (STAY) &
FPA-PMLA-1312/DLI/2016
Mahila Vikas Co-Operative Bank Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Director, Financial Intelligent Unit-India, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Rahul Krishna, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vineet Sharma, Advocate Shri Satish Aggarwala, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 06.10.2016 FPA-PMLA-1312/DLI/2016
The reply in the appeal has not been filed and therefore, the learned counsel for the appellant seeks some more time to file the rejoinder. Let the same may be filed within six weeks from today. Let the same may be filed on 1st November, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(K.Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 6th October, 2016. ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1312/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Mahila Vikas Co-Operative Bank Ltd.
The Director, Financial Intelligent Unit-India, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
