The appellate tribunal listed the matter for further orders, granting the respondent a final opportunity to file a reply and time for a rejoinder. No substantive disposition was recorded in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1257/BNG/2016 Shankara Gouda A. Patil … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Mr. Chidananda URS, Advocat For the respondent : Shri Atual Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 02.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1257/BNG/2016
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within three weeks. Rejoinder be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List on 9th December, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
2nd November, 2016
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1257/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
Shankara Gouda A. Patil
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
MANMOHAN SINGH
MISHRA
BANSAL
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
