Disposed
FPA-ND-25/DLI/2014 of Tahseen v/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
ATFPFPA-ND-25/DLI/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Tahseen V/s The Competent Authority, Delhi
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-ND-110/DLI/2014 (Stay) &
FPA-ND-25/DLI/2014
Tahseen … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri V.K. Shandilya, Advocate For the respondent : Smt. Geeta Mittal, Superintendent Competent Authority CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 21.11.2016
MP-ND-110/DLI/2014 (Stay) & FPA-ND-25/DLI/2014
In the present case the property was purchased by the appellant
despite of the status quo order passed by this Tribunal. The appearance of the appellant is necessary. He shall remain present on the next date,
otherwise order would be passed against the appellant also.
List on 19th December, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
21st November, 2016
‘R’
FPA-ND-25/DLI/2014
Page 1 of 1
Tahseen
The Competent Authority
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court