FPA-18/BOM/2015 of Varsha Rajnikant Shah v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Varsha Rajnikant Shah V/s The Competent…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-18/BOM/2015
Varsha Rajnikant Shah … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Jacklin Talwar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Siddhartha Majumdar, Inspecting Officer
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
15.11.2016
FPA-18/BOM/2015
Rejoinder has been filed. The proxy counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits that along with the rejoinder certain new documents have been filed but she is not aware as to whether those documents were part of the record before the Competent Authority. She seeks some time to verify the same and inform the Tribunal.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Varsha Rajnikant Shah
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
MANMOHAN SINGH
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court