FPA-11/MDS/2012 of T.P. Moideen Koya v/s The Competent Authority, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge order listing the appeal/application on adjournment after the appellant's counsel was absent despite the appellant appearing in person.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
MP-7/MDS/2012 & FPA-11/MDS/2012
T.P. Moideen Koya
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri T.P. Moideen Koya, Appellant For the respondent : Shri Christopher Vasanth, I.O. CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 18.10.2016
MP-7/MDS/2012 & FPA-11/MDS/2012
On 12th May, 2015 the appeal and the application were put up for
further arguments on 21st May, 2015. From the said date, it has been noticed that learned counsel for the appellant has been taking adjournments in the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
T.P. Moideen Koya
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Chennai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
8 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court