Disposed¶41

Nasyam Mahammad Jafar Saheb v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Apr 2026WP/9644/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC W.P. No. 9644 of 2026 (decided 09.04.2026, Dr. Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao): police interference in private civil dispute; writ of mandamus under Article 226; direction to police (Inspection II Town P.S. and I Town P.S., Nandyal) not to summon petitioner to police station and not to interfere in civil suit O.S. No. 549 of 2019 (Principal Junior Civil Judge, Nandyal); police stand: summons only for counselling; Articles 14, 19, 21 invoked; disposed of with no order as to costs.

What did the court decide?

Declaration sought in terms of mandamus granted in effect: Respondent Nos.5 and 6 directed not to call the Petitioner to the police station hereafter and not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.7 and 8; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. ¶41

Nasyam Mahammad Jafar Saheb Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3521]

¶2

APHC010192602026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 9644/2026

¶8

Between:

¶9

NASYAM MAHAMMAD JAFAR SAHEB, S/O LATE N ABDUL JABBAR, AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 28/759-M4-1G, NCOS COLONY, NEAR MORE MARKET, LALITHA NAGAR, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.-522237

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.-522237

¶14

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYALTOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT-518501

¶15

THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT-518501

¶16

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, II TOWN P.S, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT.-518501

¶17

THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NANDYAL I TOWN P.S, NANDYAL TOWN, NANDYAL DISTRICT.-518501

¶18

¶19

Dr.YLR, J W.P.No.9644 of 2026 Dated 09.04.2026

¶20

NASYAM NASREEN, W/O N M JAFAR SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 4-497, NASYAM STREET. NANDYAL TOWN, NANDAYL DISTRICT. -518501

¶21

N MD HIDAYATULLAH, S/O N M JAFAR SAHEB, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 4-497, NASYAM STREET. NANDYAL TOWN, NANDAYL DISTRICT-518501

¶22

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.AYESHA AZMA S

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.GP FOR HOME

¶27

2.GP FOR REVENUE

¶28

The Court made the following: ORDER :

¶29

The Writ Petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of

¶30

India seeking the following relief:-

¶31

“…to issue a Writ order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the actions of the Respondents especially the respondents no 5 and 6 in interfering at the behest of respondents No 7 and 8 without any manner of right and threatening him to settle the civil disputes and the same is sub judice before the Honble Court of Principal Junior Civil Judge Nandyal vide O S No 549 of 2019 as illegal arbitrary and violative of Articles 14 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents no 5 and 6not to interfere with in the civil disputes and not to call the petitioner to the police station and to remove the police force from the private property belonging to the petitioner and pass such order(s).”

¶32

Heard the learned Counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Assistant

¶33

Government Pleader for Home.

¶34

Sri Ayesh Azma, learned counsel for the Petitioner, submits that

¶35

Respondent Nos.7 and 8, at the instance of Respondent Nos.5 and 6, have

¶36

¶37

Dated 09.04.2026

¶38

Dr.YLR, J W.P.No.9644 of 2026

¶39

unnecessarily called the Petitioner to the police station and threatened the Petitioner to settle the civil dispute with Respondent Nos.7 and 8.

¶40

Sri P. Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, submits that the Petitioner was called to the police station only for the purpose of counselling, and that the Petitioner was not harassed by the respondent police.

¶41

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, and recording the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader, the Writ Petition is disposed of, directing Respondent Nos.5 and 6 not to call the Petitioner to the police station hereafter and not to interfere in the civil dispute pending between the Petitioner and Respondent Nos.7 and 8. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶42

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed.

¶43

_________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J

¶44

Date: 09.04.2026 KMS

¶45

¶46

Dr.YLR, J W.P.No.9644 of 2026 Dated 09.04.2026

¶47

100

¶48