Madi Gangayamma v. the State of Ap
Case brief
What is this about?
AP High Court (Amaravati) writ petition closed without adjudication — alleged threatened dispossession by Tahsildar and Special Deputy Tahsildar (Tribal Welfare), Rajavommangi Mandal, Polavaram District; land at Kindra Village, Sy.No.81-3b (Ac.3.00 cents) and Sy.No.81-1b (Ac.0.65 cents); mandamus under Article 226; interim application under Section 151 CPC; Tahsildar's written instructions dated 04.04.2026 denying official interference and noting private property dispute between Petitioner and Respondent Nos. 5 and 6 (Ruthala Devudu, Pothala Devudamma); grievance held redressed; petition and miscellaneous petitions closed; no findings on title or possession.
What did the court decide?
None; the Writ Petition was closed as the Petitioner's grievance stood redressed on the basis of the Tahsildar's written instructions dated 04.04.2026 recording that Respondent Nos. 3 and 4 were not interfering with the subject property.