Dismissed¶¶29

Nandipati Chiranjeevi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Apr 2026WP/8709/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; dismissed as withdrawn; liberty to file fresh writ petition; Notice No. ON/1073459358 dated 20.12.2025; seizure of shop by respondent officials; Vijayawada Municipal Corporation; State of Andhra Pradesh MA and UD Dept.; no costs; interlocutory applications closed; no statutes or cases cited; no merits adjudicated.

What did the court decide?

Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition challenging the Notice bearing No. ON/1073459358, dated 20.12.2025, and the seizure of the shop; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications, if any, closed. ¶¶29

Nandipati Chiranjeevi Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010154552026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 8709/2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

NANDIPATI CHIRANJEEVI, S/O LATE VITTAL RAO, BUSINESS IN ELECTRICAL GOODS D.NO.11-37-7, CHIPPADAVARI STREET, VIJAYAWADA-520001

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MA AND UD DEPT., SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238.

¶14

VIJAYAWADA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP., BY ITS COMMISSIONER VIJAYAWADA-520001

¶15

N NARASIMHA RAO, S/O LATE GANGHADHARA KARAMCHAND GANDHI AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS,DR.NO.11-25-345, SAMARANGAM CHOWK VIJAYAWADA-520001

¶16

N GOPALA KRISBPA, S/O LATE GANGHADHARA KARAMCHAND GANDHI AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, DR.NO. 11-25-345, SAMARANGAM CHOWK VIJAYAWADA-520001

¶17

N LEELA RAGHUNATHA RAO, S/O LATE N.V.S.K. RAO AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, DR.NO. 1-47-19/4, VIDYADHARAPURAM, TAYARAMMA STREET, K.K.NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA-520012

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶20

1.VAJJHALA SATYANARAYANA PRASAD

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶22

1.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

¶23

2.S.V.S.S.SIVARAM SC For VMC

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

ORAL ORDER:

¶26

Ms. M.S.V.S. Sudha Rani, learned Counsel representing on behalf of Sri Vajjhala Satyanarayana Prasad, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, submits that, after filing of the present Writ Petition, the Respondent Officials have seized the shop.

¶27

Therefore, Ms. M.S.V.S. Sudha Rani, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, seeks to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition challenging the Notice bearing No. ON/1073459358, dated 20.12.2025, as well as the seizure of the shop.

¶28

3. Request granted.

¶29

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh Writ Petition challenging the Notice bearing No. ON/1073459358, dated 20.12.2025, as well as the seizure of the shop. No order as to costs.

¶30