Dismissed¶37

Chennamsetty Murali Krishna, v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Apr 2026WP/8126/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; no merits adjudication; challenge under Article 226 to Tahsildar, Kadapa Mandal erecting caution board over petitioner's land in Sy.Nos. 64/A, 69 and 447 of Kadapa Sahar, YSR District; Articles 14, 19, 21, 300-A; Section 151 CPC interim applications; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; Justice Sumathi Jagadam; 6 April 2026; Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, closed. ¶37

Chennamsetty Murali Krishna, Vs the State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010188662019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3459]

¶5

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 8126/2019

¶9

Between:

¶10

CHENNAMSETTY MURALI KRISHNA,, S/O. CHENNAMSETTY KRISHNA MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O.D.NO.14/600, NAKASH STREET, CUDDAPAH TOWN, YSR DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, REP., BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS,VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶14

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, YSR DISTRICT, KADAPA

¶15

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KADAPA REVENUE DIVISION, YSR DISTRICT.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, KADAPA MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT.

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of

¶19

¶20

JS,J W.P.No.8126 of 2019

¶21

the respondent No.4 in erecting a Caution Board in the land in an extant of Ac.4.49 Cents in Sy.No.64/A, Ac.0.69 Cents in Sy.No.69 and Ac.8.82 Cents in Sy.No.447 of Kadapa Sahar, Kadapa Mandal, YSR District, belong to the petitioner, that the same is belong to Government and that the tress passers will be prosecuted and also preventing me from enjoying the same without adhering to due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, colorable exercise of power and well established legal principles apart from being violative of the fundamental and Constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the petitioner's rights over the land in an extant of Ac.4.49 Cents in Sy.No.64/A, Ac.0.69 Cents in Sy.No.69 and Ac.8.82 Cents in Sy.No.447 of Kadapa Sahar, Kadapa Mandal, YSR District, belong to the petitioner and pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.4 not to interfere with the petitioner's rights over the land in an extant of Ac.4.49 Cents in Sy.No.64/A, Ac.0.69 Cents in Sy.No.69 and Ac.8.82 Cents in Sy.No.447 of Kadapa Sahar, Kadapa Mandal, YSR District, belong to the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass

¶24

IA NO: 2 OF 2019

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit me file the photograph of the caution board as additional material paper, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition.

¶26

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶27

1.V R REDDY KOVVURI

¶28

¶29

JS,J W.P.No.8126 of 2019

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶31

1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶32

This Court made the following:

¶33

¶34

JS,J W.P.No.8126 of 2019

¶35

ORDER:

¶36

Mr. Shaik Ameenuddin, learned counsel, representing Mr. V. R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶37

Permission is accorded, and the Writ Petition is dismissed as

¶38

withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶39

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed.

¶40

_________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶41

6^th April, 2026 cbs

¶42

¶43