K.Mallikarjun, Ysr Kadapa Dist v. Vc & Md, Apsrtc, Hyderabad & 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
APSRTC Shramik recruitment; BC-B category vacancies; Kadapa Division; Proceedings A3/684[1]/14-RMK dated 22.07.2015; Regional Manager APSRTC Kadapa; appointment of ineligible/unqualified candidates; Article 226 writ of mandamus; violation of Articles 14, 16 and 21; arbitrariness and discrimination; interim orders in W.P.M.P. No. 7726 of 2017 dated 20.04.2017/24.04.2017; compliance proceedings LC/32(1)/16-RM-K dated 14.07.2017; dismissal for non-prosecution (default of petitioner); no order as to costs; pending applications closed; Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam; decided 10.03.2026; APHC Amaravati Special Original Jurisdiction.
What did the court decide?
As the petitioner was absent and gave no representation, the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs; the substantive challenge was not adjudicated.