Dismissed¶37

Smt Sompalli Bhargavi v. State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC8 Mar 2026WP/22788/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anganwadi worker appointment challenge; Sanayapalem village; Rapur Mandal; SPSR Nellore; ICDS Project Director Nellore; Proceedings No. 64/2015 dated 10.11.2015; Kesani Renuka (5th respondent); Sompalli Bhargavi (petitioner); Rule of Reservation; WP No. 22788/2017 (body prints 22778 of 2017); dismissed for non-prosecution; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; no merits adjudication; decision dated 09.03.2026.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution, with no order as to costs, there being no representation for the petitioner on the date fixed for dismissal. ¶37

Smt Sompalli Bhargavi Vs State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010027592017

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3504]

¶5

MONDAY, THE NINTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 22788/2017

¶9

Between:

¶10

SMT SOMPALLI BHARGAVI, W/O T. VENKATARATNAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS OCC: HOUSE WIFE R/O. SANAYAPALEM VILLAGE, RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WD & CW DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTIIR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR NELLORE RURAL SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, -

¶15

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, NELLORE RURAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT

¶16

THE I C D S PROJECT DIRECTOR NELLORE SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT, -

¶17

KESANI RENUKA, W/O. MADHU, R/O. KANDALURU DAM COLONY VILLAGE KAMBHALAPALLE, OF RAPUR MANDAL, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF

¶20

¶21

MANDAMUS declaring the action of respondent No.4 in appointing the 5th respondent as anganwadi worker for sanayapalem village Rapur Mandal vide proceedings No. 64/2015 dated 10.11.2015 as illegal arbitrary, contrary to the Government Orders and conditions of notification and also violative of Rule of Reservation and set aside the same, further direct the respondents No. 2,3,& 4 to conduct a detailed enquiry forthwith into the selection and appointment of the 5th respondent as Anganwadi worker basing on the representation made by the petitioner and further direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadii worker and pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 28064 OF 2017

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the appointment of Respondent No. 5 issued by the respondent No. 4 under Proceedings No. 64 of 2015 dated 10.11.2015 pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass.

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶25