Dismissed¶25

Vemala Ruksana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Apr 2026WP/5175/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati; WRIT PETITION NO: 5175/2026; Vemala Ruksana v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Collector Sathya Sai District and Kadiri Municipality; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn on 08.04.2026 by Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.; withdrawal permitted at counsel's request; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; no merits determination; municipal administration / urban development respondents.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; interlocutory applications, if any, closed. ¶25

Vemala Ruksana, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010092742026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 5175/2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

VEMALA RUKSANA,, W/O LATE VEMALA ABDUL SALAM ARIF, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCCUPATION HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT D.NO. 9-582-1, BYPASS ROAD, KADIRI, SATHYA SAI DISTRICT - 515591.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI.522238

¶14

THE COLLECTOR, SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.-515134

¶15

THE KADIRI MUNICIPALITY, REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KADIRI, SATHYA SAI DISTRICT.-515591

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶18

1.PALEGARI JAYACHANDRA

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶20

1.GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP

¶21

The Court made the following:

¶22

ORAL ORDER:

¶23

Ms. Bhanu Prasad Rao, learned Counsel representing Sri Palegari Jayachandra, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner seeks to withdraw this Writ Petition.

¶24

Request granted.

¶25

Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs.

¶26

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

¶27

_________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J

Dt: 08.04.2026

DSV

164

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶32

WRIT PETITION NO: 5175/2026

¶33

08.04.2026

¶34

DSV

¶35

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI

¶36

MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 5175/2026

¶37

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶38

Sl. No	DATE	ORDER	Office Note
	08.04.2026	GRKP, J
		Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. (vide separate order)
		___________ GRKP, J DSV

Vemala Ruksana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vemala Ruksana, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunchala Siva Nageswara Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

M/ s Sankuratri Bala Manoj Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Adapa Krishna Kumari, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its

Ingilila Mothi Priyanka Vs Sri Mallavarapu Surya Teja IAS

Jamkhanghar Mohammed Rafiq, Vs The Adoni Municipality, Adoni, Kurnool District.

K. Gowtham, Nellore Dt. Vs Prl. Secretary, Mun. Admn, Hyd & 2 Othrs