Dismissed¶34

Gogineni Naga Sirisha, v. The state of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC9 Apr 2026WP/4801/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of writ petition as withdrawn on petitioner's request (letter to Registry dated 24.03.2026); original grievance concerned restraint on access to agricultural land (Ac. 3-27 Cts, Sy.No. 428, Krishnapatnam village, Muthukur Mandal, SPS Nellore District) involving State of Andhra Pradesh, Chief Commissioner of Land Administration, District Collector and Krishnapatnam Port Co Ltd; prayers invoked Article 226 mandamus and Articles 19, 21, 300-A; interim petitions under Section 151 CPC (IA 1/2018, IA 1/2023); no order as to costs; Justice Sumathi Jagadam, 10.04.2026.

What did the court decide?

Permission granted to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed. ¶34

Gogineni Naga Sirisha, Vs The state of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010108752018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3459]

¶5

FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 4801/2018

¶9

Between:

¶10

GOGINENI NAGA SIRISHA,, W/O. RAVI KUMAR, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. GOGINENIPURAM (V), GUDUR MANDAL, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE (LA) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER OF LAND ADMINISTRATION, ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD.

¶15

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, SPS NELLORE DISTRICT.

¶16

KRISHNAPATNAM PORT CO LTD, REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, NATCO HOUSE, BANJARA HILLS, ROAD NO.2, HYDERABAD.

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in restraining petitioner from accessing her land of Ac. 3-27 Cts in Sy.No. 428 at Krishnapatnam village, Muthukur Mandal, SPS Nellore District as illegal arbitrary and violative of Article 19 and 21 R/w Article 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to restrain petitioner from

¶19

¶20

accessing her land of Ac. 3-27 Cts in Sy.No. 428 at Krishnapatnam village, Muthukur Mandal, SPS Nellore District and pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2018

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to restrain the petitioner from accessing petitioner land of Ac. 3-27 Cts in Sy.No. 428 at Krishnapatnam village, Muthukur Mandal, SPS Nellore District pending disposal of this W.P. and pass

¶23

IA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to grant leave to the petitioner herein Respondent no. 3 in the WP No. 4801 of 2018 to file counter affidavit in the above writ petition and pass

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26

1.UTTARA LEGAL

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

1.GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)

¶29

2.GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO

¶30

¶31

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶32

Sri.K.Chaitanya, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a letter was addressed to the Registry on 24.03.2026, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶33

Permission is accorded.

¶34

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶35

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶36

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶37

Dated: 10.04.2026 RSD

¶38

¶39