Dismissed¶36

M v. Somasekhar v the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Apr 2026WP/3467/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissed as withdrawn; withdrawal via Court slip dated 02.04.2026; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC interim injunction (IA No. 1 of 2019); 1-B record; adangal/pahani; pattadar pass book; title deed; Sy.No. 93 Hajipuram Village; Kanigiri Mandal; Hanumanthunipadu Mandal; Prakasam District; Tahsildar; Collector and District Magistrate; State of AP Revenue Department; no order as to costs; Justice Sumathi Jagadam; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; registry ref APHC010076092019.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs. ¶36

M v Somasekhar Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010076092019

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3459]

¶5

WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 3467/2019

¶9

Between:

¶10

M V SOMASEKHAR, S/O VENKATA SUBRAHMANYAM AGED 44 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 9/447, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P

¶11

MAMIDI VENKATA SUBRAHMANYAM, S/O VENKATA SUBBAIAH AGED 82 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O 9/447, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, A.P.

¶12

...PETITIONER(S)

¶13

AND

¶14

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶15

THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, PRAKASAM BHAVAN, ONGOLE, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶16

TAHSILDAR, HANUMANTHUNIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶17

G SAVITHRI DEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN, AGED NOT KNOWN, FORMER TAHSILDAR, HANUMANTHUNIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶18

SATISH, S/O NOT KNOWN, FORMER COMPUTER OPERATOR, HANUMANTHUNIPADU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶19

GAAYAM CHENNA LAKSHMAMMA, W/O NARASIMHAREDDY @ NARASIMHULU , AGED 72 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, HAJIPURAM

¶20

¶21

VILLAGE, HANUMANTUNIPADU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶22

GAYAM TIRUPATHI REDDY, S/O NARASIMHAREDDY @ NARASIMHULU, AGED 44 YEARS, 0CC CULTIVATION, HAJIPURAM VILLAGE, HANUMANTUNIPADU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶23

SANIKOMMU TIRUPATAMMA, W/O VENKATESWARA REDDY AGED 60 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, HAJIPURAM VILLAGE, HANUMANTUNIPADU MANDAL PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

¶24

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶25

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of 'Writ of Mandamus', declaring the action of the respondents 2 and 3 in not incorporating the names of the petitioners in 1-B record, adangal/pahani and not issuing the pattadar pass book and title deed to the petitioners in respect of the land of an extent of Ac 5-20 cents each in Sy.No. 93 of Hajipuram Village of Kanigiri Mandal ,Prakasam District as illegal, arbitrary and consequently to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to incorporate the names of the petitioners in 1-B record, adangal/pahani and issuing the pattadar pass book and title deed to the petitioners in respect of the land of an extent of Ac 5-20 cents each in Sy.No. 93 of Hajipuram Village of Kanigiri Mandal ,Prakasam District and pass

¶26

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to crate third party interest in respect of the land of an extent of Ac 10.40 cents in Sy.No. 93 of Hajipuram Village of Kanigiri Mandal, Prakasam pending disposal of the Writ Petition, and pass

¶28

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶29

1.V R MACHAVARAM

¶30

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶31

1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP)

¶32

¶33

The Court made the following ORDER:

¶34

Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a Court slip dated 02.04.2026 before this Court, seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.

¶35

Permission is accorded.

¶36

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶37

As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶38

__________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM

¶39

Dated: 08.04.2026 RSD

¶40

¶41