K. Srinivasa Rao v. Prl. Secy., I & Cad Dept. & 5 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; W.P. No. 34166 of 2017; K. Srinivasa Rao v. Prl. Secy, I & CAD Dept. and 5 others; Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam; decided 05.02.2026; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution; no representation for petitioner on consecutive listings (30.01.2026 and 05.02.2026) under caption 'for dismissal'; Article 226 mandamus sought to compel enquiry by Deputy Executive Engineer/Enquiry Officer into allegations against Assistant Engineer; Neeru-Chettu Programme; Vamsadhara Project Circle; Srikakulam district; miscellaneous applications closed.
What did the court decide?
There was no representation for the petitioner when the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', including on the date of hearing (the matter had earlier gone unrepresented on 30.01.2026 as well). ¶33