Dismissed¶31

Singan Projects Limited, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Feb 2026WP/3216/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Singan Projects Limited vs State of Andhra Pradesh; WRIT PETITION NO: 3216/2020; APHC010052772020; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; commercial tax / VAT Act challenge to Impugned Order dated 31.12.2018; IA No. 1 of 2020 under Section 151 CPC for suspension; matter settled out of Court; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs, miscellaneous applications closed; decided 02.02.2026 by R. Raghunandan Rao, J. (author) and T.C.D. Sekhar, J.; no merits adjudication, no holdings.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw granted; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn with no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous applications, if any, stand closed. ¶31

Singan Projects Limited, Vs The State of… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3529]

¶2

APHC010052772020

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 3216/2020

¶10

Between:

¶11

SINGAN PROJECTS LIMITED,, FLAT NO.408, A-BLOCK, GANDHI TOWER, SUNKESULA ROAD, KURNOOL - 518 002. REP. BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR SINGANAMALA MURAHARI KRISHNA, SKI. LATE S. SUBBAIAH.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶15

THE COMMISSIONER, COMMERCIAL TAXES DEPARTMENT, D.NO.5-59, R.K.SPRING VALLEY APARTMENTS, BANDAR ROAD, EEDUPUGULLU VILLAGE, KANKIPADU MANDAL, VIJAYWADA, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶16

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CT, NEAR INDUS SCHOOL, PANDIPADU (V), DHONE ROAD, KURNOOL-518 002.

¶17

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER AUDIT, CIRCLE NO.II, KURNOOL DIVISION, NEAR INDUS SCHOOL, PANDIPADU (V), DHONE ROAD, KURNOOL-518 002.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus and declare the actions of the respondents 1 to 4 in issuing the Impugned Order dated 31.12.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, contrary to the provisions of the VAT Act and consequently quash and set aside the Impugned Order dated 31.12.2018

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased prayed that pending disposal of the writ petition this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the Impugned Order pending the disposal of the above writ petition and pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.PILLIX LAW FIRM

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.GP FOR COMMERCIAL TAX (AP)

¶27

¶28

The Court made the following order:

¶29

(Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Raghunandan Rao)

¶30

Sri Sanjeev, learned counsel appearing for M/s.Pillix Law Firm, submits that the matter has been settled out of the Court and seeks leave to withdraw this writ petition.

¶31