Dismissed¶27

M/S.Meda Ramakrishna Reddy, Rajampet,Kadapa District v. the Commercial Tax Officer, Rajampet ,Kadapa District

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Feb 2026WP/13170/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default; writ petition dismissed for non-appearance; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; WP 13170/2010; Article 226 mandamus; Commercial Tax Officer Rajampet Kadapa; CST.No.1693/POR 1 20092010 dated 26.4.2010; APVAT Act penalty Rs.21,00,650; Section 151 CPC stay application WPMP 16596 of 2010; R. Raghunandan Rao J; T.C.D. Sekhar J; decided 02.02.2026; no order as to costs; miscellaneous applications closed. Docket reference APHC010697592010.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed for default, as there was no appearance for the petitioner on 19.01.2026 nor on the date of disposal. ¶27

M/S.Meda Ramakrishna Reddy, Rajampet,Kadapa… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3529]

¶2

APHC010697592010

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 13170/2010

¶9

Between:

¶10

M/S.MEDA RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, RAJAMPET,KADAPA DISTRICT, S/O.M.V.SUBBA REDDY RAJAMPET,KADAPA DISTRICT,REP.BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER M.RAMAKRISHNA REDDY

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER RAJAMPET KADAPA DISTRICT, S/o.M.V.Subba Reddy Rajampet,Kadapa District,rep.by its Managing partner M.Ramakrishna Reddy

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ order of Direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring proceedings in CST.No.1693/POR 1 20092010 dated 26.4.2010 (served on 2.6.2010) passed by the respondent is illegal, arbitrary,and consequently siet aside the same and to pass

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WPMP 16596 OF 2010

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of collection of disputed penalty of Rs.21,00,650 under the APVAT Act pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass

¶18

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶20

1.T RAMESH BABU

¶21

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶22