Smt Nollu Lakshmi Kumari W/o Late Rama Rao, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh represented by

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Jul 2026WP/30458/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

VUDA plot allotment cancellation; notice dated 23.09.2013 (Rc.No.11693/2007 series); Rushikonda Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 Sy Nos. 34, 35; Madhurawada Sy No. 370/2P; Writ of Mandamus Article 226; interim stay S.151 CPC; show cause notice; suit for cancellation of sale deeds; Smt. Omni Pydamma handover 13.02.2007; disposed with liberty to file afresh; Justice Harinath.N; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; 08.07.2026.

What did the court decide?

Writ petitions disposed of on recorded submissions; liberty left to petitioners to file afresh if aggrieved by the subsequent orders; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶¶256

Smt Nollu Lakshmi Kumari W/o Late Rama Rao… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Writ petitions disposed of on recorded submissions; liberty left to petitioners to file afresh if aggrieved by the subsequent orders; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

¶¶256

Issue for consideration

Whether the notice dated 23.09.2013 issued by the 2nd respondent (VUDA), whereby the allotment of developed plots to the petitioners was found contrary to established law, rules and regulations and their cancellation and criminal action were proposed, is illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction.

¶¶248

Court's answer

Recording the submissions, these writ petitions are disposed of, without adjudicating the challenge to the notice on its merits.

¶¶255

Ratio / Principle

It is left open to the petitioners to file afresh if they are aggrieved by the subsequent orders.

¶¶256

Key takeaways

There shall be no order as to costs.ratio¶¶257
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.ratio¶¶258

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Batch of eleven writ petitions (WP Nos. 29771, 29772, 29793, 29808, 29823, 29824, 29994, 30448, 30449, 30458 and 30462 of 2013) by allottees/purchasers of developed plots in VUDA Layout, Rushikonda and Madhurawada, Visakhapatnam, under Article 226 challenging the notice dated 23.09.2013 issued by VUDA (2nd respondent) whereby their plot allotments were found contrary to established law, rules and regulations, with a show cause notice proposing cancellation of allotments and criminal action. The Court (Harinath.N, J.) recorded the submissions - extension of time till 31.10.2013 to reply to the show cause notice; the respondent's counter alleging collusion, receipt of the subject land from Smt. Omni Pydamma on 13.02.2007 and identified irregularities in the allotment of alternate plots; and the authority's suit for cancellation of the sale deeds - and disposed of the writ petitions without deciding the merits, leaving the petitioners free to file afresh if aggrieved by the subsequent orders. No order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed.

¶1

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 08.07.2026 Date of uploading :

¶2

APHC010082492013

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3457]

¶6

WEDNESDAY, THE 8^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N

¶9

WRIT PETITION NOs: 29771, 29772, 29793, 29808, 29823, 29824, 29994, 30448, 30449, 30458 and 30462/2013

¶10

WRIT PETITION NO: 29771/2013

¶11

Between:

¶12

KOLLA ANURADHA, W/O K.HANUMANTHA RAO AGED 38 YEARS R/O 4-5-26/14, 4/1, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR

¶13

...PETITIONER

¶14

AND

¶15

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶16

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

¶19

¶20

Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over the Plots bearing Nos. 4 & 5 admeasuring 600 sq yds each in Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 at VUDA Layout in Sy Nos. 34/1 and 11 and 35/1 of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 36971 OF 2013

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dt 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/07/1-1 /ANN-II/26 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of W.P.No. of 2013

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.SOMISETTY GANESH BABU SC For VUDA and MUDA

¶27

2.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶28

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶29

WRIT PETITION NO: 29772/2013

¶30

Between:

¶31

KOILA HANUMANTHA RAO, S/O VENKATESWARLU, AGED 46 YEARS R/O D.NO. 4-5-26/14, 4/1, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR

¶32

MADDIREDDY SUJATHA, W/O M.V.S. REDDY, AGED 36 YEARS R/O D.NO. 59-60-31/54, PATAMATA, ASHOKNAGAR VIJAYAWADA

¶33

...PETITIONER(S)

¶34

AND

¶35

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ET URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶36

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,

¶37

¶38

VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶39

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶40

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt: 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/07/I-1/ANN-II/27 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over their respective plots i.e. Plot bearing Nos. 55 Et 3 admeasuring 600 sq yds each in Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 at V U D A Layout in Sy Nos. 34 (P) and 35 (P) of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs and pass.

¶41

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 36972 OF 2013

¶42

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dt 23-9-2013 in RC.No. 11693/07/I-1/ANN-11127 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of WP No. of 2013.

¶43

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶44

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶45

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶46

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶47

2.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶48

WRIT PETITION NO: 29793/2013

¶49

Between:

¶50

KOLLA SRINIVASA RAO S/O VENKATESWARLU AGED 42 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 5-87/70/3, 1/3 CHANDRAMOUTINAGAR, GUNTUR

¶51

MADDIREDDY SUJATHA W/O MVS REDDY AGED 39 YEARS, R/O D.NO. 59-60-31/5-4, PATAMATA, ASHOKNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA

¶52

KOLLA HANUMANTHA RAO S/O VENKATESWARLU AGED 46,

¶53

¶54

YEARS R/O D.NO. 4-5-26/14, 4/1 VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR

¶55

VEMULAPALLI SRI RAM PRASAD SIO RAJA RAO,, AGED 39 YEARS R/O D.NO. 3-38-46 BRUNDAVAN GARDENS, GUNTUR

¶56

C.VENKATA KRISHNA RAO S/O LATE SAIDAIAH, AGED 45 YEARS RIO D.NO. 3-30-11/4 A YAGANTI PRINCE APARTMENT, BRUNDAVAN GARDENS, GUNTUR

¶57

...PETITIONER(S)

¶58

AND

¶59

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION IT URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶60

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶61

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶62

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/07/1-1/ANN-1/9 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over their respective plots i.e. Plot bearing Nos. 48, 30, 39, 56, 57 and 47 respectively in Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 at V U D A Layout in 5y Nos. 34 (P) and 35 (P) of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs and pass such other or further orders as are deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶63

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 36999 OF 2013

¶64

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dated 23.9.2013 in Rd.No.11693/07/I-1/ANN-I/9 on the file of the 2nd respondent

¶65

¶66

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶67

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶68

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶69

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶70

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶71

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶72

WRIT PETITION NO: 29808/2013

¶73

Between:

¶74

SMT KARRI SOWJANYA PRIIYA W/O K.PAVAN,, R/O D.NO. 9-348/3, VISALAKSHI NAGAR POLICE QUARTERS ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶75

C VENKATA KRISHNA RAO S/O LATE SAIDAIAH,, R/O 3-30-11/4/A PLOT NO.204, YAGANTI PRINCE, 5TH LANE, BRUNDAVAN GARDEN, GUNTUR

¶76

S.SRINIVASA RAO S/O LATE VENKAIAH, R/O D.NO.4-19-76, VIDYANAGAR, GUNTUR

¶77

...PETITIONER(S)

¶78

AND

¶79

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION A URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶80

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶81

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶82

¶83

¶84

Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over their respective plots i.e. Plot bearing Nos. 183, 195 and 213 in Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 at V U D A Layout in Sy Nos. 34 (P) and 35 (P) of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs

¶85

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37015 OF 2013

¶86

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dt 23-9-2013 in RC.No. 11693/07/1-1/ANN-l/20 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of WP No. of 2013.

¶87

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶88

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶89

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶90

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶91

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶92

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶93

WRIT PETITION NO: 29823/2013

¶94

Between:

¶95

SMT KARRI PUSHPA ALIAS MAMATHA, W/O K.V.S.PRASAD, AGED 38 YEARS R/O D.NO. 9-348/3, POLICE QUARTERS ROAD, VISALAKSHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶96

C VENKATA KRISHNA RAO, S/O LATE SAIDAIAH, AGED 46 YEARS R/O 3-30-11/4/A PLOT NO.204, YAGANTI PRINCE, 5TH LANE, BRUNDAVAN GARDEN, GUNTUR

¶97

SMT. V. USHA RANI, W/O V.SRIRAM PRASAD AGED 40 YEARS R/O D.NO. 1-27-14, SVSN COLONY, GUNTUR

¶98

...PETITIONER(S)

¶99

AND

¶100

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL

¶101

¶102

SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT:, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶103

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶104

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶105

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/07/1-1/ANN-1/2 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over their respective plots i.e. Plot bearing Nos. 264, 148 and 262 in Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 at V U D A Layout in Sy Nos. 34 (P) and 35 (P) of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs

¶106

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37029 OF 2013

¶107

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedigns pursuant to Notice dated 23.09.2013 in Rc.No.11693/07/1-1/ANN-1/2 on the file of the 2nd respondent, pending disposal of the writ petition

¶108

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶109

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶110

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶111

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶112

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶113

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶114

WRIT PETITION NO: 29824/2013

¶115

Between:

¶116

M.V.SATYANARAYANA REDDY S/O M.SUBBA REDDY,, R/O D.NO.

¶117

¶118

59-6-31 S4, PATAMATA, ASHOKNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DIST.

¶119

VEMULAPALLI USHA RANI W/O V.SRI RAM PRASAD,, R/O D.NO. 1- 27-14 SVN COLONY, GUNTUR

¶120

...PETITIONER(S)

¶121

AND

¶122

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶123

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT, AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶124

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶125

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/2007/1-1 /ANN-I/19 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over their respective plots i.e. Plot bearing Nos. 224, 225 & 226 in Layout LP No. 36 of 2009 at V U D A Layout in Sy Nos. 34 (P) and 35 (P) of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs

¶126

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37030 OF 2013

¶127

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dt.23.9.2013 in Rc.NO. 11693/07/I-1/ANN-I/19 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of W.P. No. of 2013.

¶128

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶129

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶130

¶131

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶132

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶133

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶134

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶135

WRIT PETITION NO: 29994/2013

¶136

Between:

¶137

SMT.IPPAKA NARASAYYAMMA, W/O.CHANDRA RAO, R/O.D.NO.1055-37, BLOCK NO.21/1, RAMNAGAR,VISAKHAPATNAM

¶138

IPPAKA SIVA SANKAR PRADEEP KUMAR, S/O.CHANDRA RAO, R/O.D.NO.44-34-12/5 RAILWAY QUARTERS, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶139

IPPAKA SRINIVAS, S/O.CHANDRA RAO, R/O.D.NO.10-55-37, BLOCK NO.21/1 RAMNAGAR,VISAKHAPATNAM

¶140

PILLI PAPAYYAMMA, W/O.P.APPALANARASAYYA, R/O.H.NO.15-5092, NEAR NOOKALAMMA TEMPLE, WARD NO.23, BHEEMILI,VISAKHAPATNAM

¶141

PILLI HEMA VARAHA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA KISHIORE, S/O.P.APPALANARASAYYA, R/O.H.NO.15-50-92, NEAR NOOKALAMMA TEMPLE, WARD NO.23, BHEEMILI, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶142

BORA MARIYA,W/O.B.SRIRAMA MURTHY,, R/O.D.NO.30-96-37, NEAR KANITHI HIGH SCHOOL, KURMANNAPALEM,, VISAKHAPATNAM.

¶143

BORA HARI PRASAD BEEHAMRAO, S/O.SRI RAMA MURTHY, R/O.D.NO.30-96-37, NEAR KANITHI HIGH SCHOOL, KURMANNAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶144

PILLI VENKATA LAKSHMI, W./O.LATE PILLI YERRAYYA, R/O.H.NO.15-50-92, NEAR NOOKALAMMA TEMPLE, WARD NO.23, BHEEMILI, VISAKHAPATNAM

...PETITIONER(S)

AND

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,AT SECRETARIAT,HYDERABAD

¶149

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶150

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶151

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or writs order or direction declaring and setting aside the Notice dated 23.9.20213 in Rc.No.11693/2007/I-1/ANN-1/14 on the file of the 2nd respondent ,as illegal, arbitrary void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the respondents not ot interfere with the possession of the petitioners over thesir plots i.e. plot bearing Nos.6,7,8,9,& 10 in Sy.No.370/2P of Madhurawada village, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, Visakhapatnam District award costs and pass

¶152

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37229 OF 2013

¶153

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dated 23.9.2013 in Rc.No.11693/2007/I-1/ANN-1/14 on the file of the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the WP.No. of 2013

¶154

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶155

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶156

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶157

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶158

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶159

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶160

¶161

WRIT PETITION NO: 30448/2013

¶162

Between:

¶163

SINGAMPALLI YERRI BABU, S/O LATE SINGAMPALLI RAMA MURTHY, AGED 59 YEARS R/O D.NO. 14-37-24/18, AMERICAN HOSPITAL AREA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶164

SMT M VARA LAKSHMI, W/O M.VENKATESWARA RAO, AGED 57 YEARS R/O H.NO. 7-159, VEPAGUNDA, PRAHLADAPURAM, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶165

...PETITIONER(S)

¶166

AND

¶167

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶168

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶169

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶170

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toIssue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/D/2007/I-1/ANN-1/16 on the file 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the property bearing Plot Nos. 165, 166, 173, 219, 228, 231 a 236 of Rushikonda Layout in LP No. 36/2009 of Sy Nos. 34 & 35 of Rushikonda Layout and Plot Nos. 16, 74, 77 and 96 of Yendada in Visakhapatnam District; Award costs and pass

¶171

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37800 OF 2013

¶172

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice Dt. 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/D/2007/I-1/ANN-1/16 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposalof the WP.No. of 2013 and pass

¶173

¶174

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶175

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶176

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶177

¶178

2.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶179

3.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶180

WRIT PETITION NO: 30449/2013

¶181

Between:

¶182

SMT KARRI PUSHPA ALIAS MAMATHA, W/O K.V.S.PRASAD, AGED 38 YEARS R/O D.NO. 9-348/3, POLICE QUARTERS ROAD, VISALAKSHI NAGAR, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶183

...PETITIONER

¶184

AND

¶185

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶186

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶187

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶188

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt 21.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/C/2007/1-1/ANN-I/22 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioner over her property bearing Plot No. 263 admeasuring 433.34 sq yds, in Layout LP No.

¶189

¶190

36 of 2009 at V U D A Layout in Sy Nos. 34 (P) and 35 (P) of Rushikonda Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs

¶191

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37801 OF 2013

¶192

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dt.21-9-2013 in RC.No.11693/C/2007/1-1/ANN-1/22 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of W.P.

¶193

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶194

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶195

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶196

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶197

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶198

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶199

WRIT PETITION NO: 30458/2013

¶200

Between:

¶201

SMT NOLLU LAKSHMI KUMARI W/O LATE RAMA RAO,, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶202

N.JALAJAKSHI D/O LATE RAMA RAO,, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶203

N.KALYANI D/O LATE RAMA RAO,, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶204

N.SARATH KUMAR S/O LATE RAMA RAO,, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶205

N.SATTI RAJU S/O APPALA RAJU,, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶206

N.RAVI S/O SATTI RAJU,, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶207

¶208

N.MAHESH S/O SATTI RAJU, R/O D.NO. 16-11-1, KOTHA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶209

T.VENKATA LAKSHMI W/O GURUMURTHY, R/O D.NO. 20-24-18 PAINDORAPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶210

CH VIJAYA LAKSHMI W/O RAMACHANDRA RAO, R/O D.NO. 16-1425 KOTA JALARIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶211

...PETITIONER(S)

¶212

AND

¶213

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REPRESENTED BY, ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ET URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶214

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPTD. BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN

¶215

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶216

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt 23.9.2013 in Rc.No. 11693/07/I-1/ANN-1/1 on the file of the rd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the property bearing Plot Nos. 203, 204 of Rushikonda Layout in S.No. 34 & 35, Rushikonda Village, in Plot No. 10 A, 24, 91 of Madhurawada in Sy No. 370/371, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs

¶217

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37810 OF 2013

¶218

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dt 23-9-2013 in RC.No.11693/2007/1-1/ANN-I/1 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of WP No. of 2013.

¶219

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶220

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶221

¶222

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶223

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶224

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶225

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶226

WRIT PETITION NO: 30462/2013

¶227

Between:

¶228

SHAIK MUSA, S/O SHAIK HUSSAIN, AGED 32 YEARS R/O D.NO. 264-5, PERIKI STREET, VELAMPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶229

MEERABI SHAIK, W/O SHAIK HUSSAIN, AGED 55 YEARS R/O D.NO. 26-4-5, PERIKI STREET, VELAMPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM

¶230

...PETITIONER(S)

¶231

AND

¶232

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION ET URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT AT SECRETARIAT HYDERABAD

¶233

VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS VICE CHAIRMAN.

¶234

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶235

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Writs, Order or Direction, declaring and setting aside the Notice dt: 23.09.2013 in RC No. 11693/2007/I-1/ANN-I/11 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, as illegal, arbitrary, void and without jurisdiction and to consequently direct direct the Respondents not to interfere with the possession of the petitioners over the property bearing Plot Nos. 161, 283 and 291 in Rushikonda and Plot No. 11 a 23 in S.No. 370 and 371 of Madhurawada Village, Visakhapatnam District; Award costs and pass.

¶236

¶237

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(WPMP 37818 OF 2013

¶238

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings pursuant to Notice dated 23-09-2013 in RC No. 11693/2007/1-1/ANN-I/11 on the file of the 2nd Respondent, pending disposal of WP No. of 2013.

¶239

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶240

1.T SUJAN KUMAR

¶241

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶242

1.GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV

¶243

2.A VEERABHADRA RAO Addl.SC FOR VMRDA

¶244

3.P JAGADISH CHANDRA PRASAD(SC FOR VUDA)

¶245

The Court made the following:

¶246

¶247

Common Order:-

¶248

In all this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have challenged the notice dated 23.09.2013 issued by the 2^nd respondent, whereby the allotment of developed plots to the petitioners was found to be contrary to the established law, rules and regulations governing the authority.

¶249

The 2^nd respondent has stated that the allotments were irregular and that the plots allotted to the petitioners were cancelled. A show cause notice in that regard was issued to the petitioners calling upon them to submit their explanation as to why the allotment of the plots ought not to be cancelled and as to why criminal action ought not to be initiated against them.

¶250

The learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 2^nd respondent had accepted the request for extension of time for filing a reply to the show cause notice dated 23.09.2013 till 31.10.2013.

¶251

A counter has been filed by the 2^nd respondent stating that the petitioners have colluded with the authorities and have not arrayed the necessary parties as respondents, as the subject land was handed over to the 2^nd respondent on 13.02.2007 by one Smt. Omni Pydamma. It is also stated that the 2^nd respondent has identified several irregularities in the allotment of alternate plots and, as such, the respondent authority found it appropriate to cancel the allotments.

¶252