Governament of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal v. Pyla Govinda Rao
Case brief
What is this about?
Keywords: writ petition dismissed as infructuous; efflux of time; certiorari under Article 226 against Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal order in OA No. 1071 of 2006 (dt. 2-5-2006); Irrigation & CAD (P.W) Department; Chief Engineer, North Coast; Superintending Engineer, Vamsahara Project Circle; Selection Committee for Displaced Persons, Srikakulam; suspension application under Section 151 CPC (WPMP 33371 of 2006); early-hearing application (WPMP 22961 of 2008); expedition application (WPMP 1353 of 2011); Government Pleader for Services-II K.Ramalingeswara Rao; counsel P Krishna Reddy and Akkam Eshwar; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; bench Ravi Nath Tilhari, J. and Purushottam Kumar Chintalapudi, J.; decision dated 08.07.2026.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous, the Court recording the Government Pleader for Services-II's submission that the writ petition had been rendered infructuous by efflux of time.