Dismissed¶¶29

P. Radha krishna Murthy, v. The Commissioner

Andhra Pradesh HC2 Mar 2026WP/24707/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC Writ Petition 24707/2013; P. Radha Krishna Murthy v. Commissioner, Nellore Municipal Corporation & Vakati Venkateswara Kumar; dismissed for non-prosecution on 03.03.2026 by Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J.; petitioner/counsel absent on 23.02.2026 and again on 03.03.2026 when matter listed under caption 'for dismissal'; petition pending since 2013; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; merits not decided; no statutes or cases cited.

What did the court decide?

The Court declined to adjourn the Writ Petition, having regard to its pendency since 2013 and the petitioner's continued non-appearance. ¶¶28

P. Radha krishna Murthy, Vs The Commissioner — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

APHC010790282013

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

[3328]

¶6

TUESDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 24707/2013

¶10

Between:

¶11

P. RADHA KRISHNA MURTHY, S/O. VENKATESWARLU AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, PEDDA BAZAR, NELLORE CITY, SRI POTTI SREERAMULU NELLORE DIST.

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER, NELLORE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, NELLORE CITY,

¶15

VAKATI VENKATESWARA KUMAR, S/O. RAMAIAH, AGED 54 YEARS, R/O. 18/112, LANGAR KHANA STREET, NELLORE CITY.

¶16

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶17

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶18

1.G VASANTHA RAYUDU

¶19

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶20

1.B HANUMANTHA RAO (SC FOR KUR&NEL MC)

¶21

2.MADHAVA RAO NALLURI

¶22

¶23

The Court made the following:

¶24

ORAL ORDER:

¶25

None appeared for the Writ Petitioner.

¶26

Sri B.Hanumantha Rao, learned Standing Counsel for Kurnool and Nellore Municipal Corporation and Sri P.Vinod Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Madhava Rao Nalluri, learned Counsel for 2^nd Respondent are present.

¶27

On 23.02.2026, when this Writ Petition was listed, none appeared for the Writ Petitioner. On the direction of this Court, the matter is listed today under the caption 8for dismissal9. Today also none appeared for the Writ Petitioner.

¶28

Having recorded the same and also having regard to the fact that the Writ Petition is pending on the file of this Court since the year 2013, this Court is not inclined to adjourn the Writ Petition.

¶29