Tagiri Ramakrishna Reddy v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Case brief
What is this about?
AP High Court Amaravati writ petition dismissed for default (07.07.2026, Justice V. Sujatha); Article 226 mandamus sought against dispossession of Ac.3.38 cents, Patta No.76/P.No.50, Settipalli Village, Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Chittoor District; grounds challenged: Settlement Officer order S.R.No.56/11(a)/88 dated 09.05.1988 and Director of Settlements order R.P.160/1988 H1 dated 16.09.1999; interim restraint petition under Section 151 CPC (IA No. 1 of 2018); respondents include State of Andhra Pradesh, Chief Commissioner of Appeals Land Administration, Director of Settlements, Joint Collector cum Settlement Officer Chittoor, Tahsildar Tirupathi Urban Mandal, Sinigiri Ramanjulu; dismissal due to repeated non-representation by petitioners' counsel; no order as to costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; non-reportable.
What did the court decide?
This writ petition is dismissed for default, as there was no representation on behalf of counsel for the petitioners on successive hearing dates and the petitioners were not evincing interest in pursuing the matter.