Writ petition challenging cancellation of the petitioner's pattadar passbook/title deed was dismissed as abated after counsel reported that the petitioner had died. Interlocutory applications were closed, with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
[3333]
Date of reserved for orders :
Date of pronouncement : 07.07.2026 Date of uploading : 18.07.2026
APHC010364292018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE 7th DAY OF JULY 2026
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
WRIT PETITION NO: 16975/2018
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass an order or orders or writ more particularly on in the nature
2
VS,J W.P.No.16975 of 2018
of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd Respondent in cancelling the pattadhar passbook/title deed issued favour of the petitioner vide D.Dis.No. 2003/2017/D4 dated 28.03.2018as illegal, arbitrary and in contrary to the provisions of AP rights in Land and Pattadar Passbooks Act and rules there under besides violating Petitioners rights under Article 14 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the order of the 2nd respondent vide D.Dis.No. 2003/2017/D4 dated 28.03.2018 and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the order of the 2nd respondent vide D.Dis.No. 2003/2017/D4 dated 28.03.2018pending disposal of writ petition and to pass
IA NO: 2 OF 2018
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the matter 'FOR BEING MENTION" caption take up the IA No.1 of 2018 in WP No. 16975 of 2018
Counsel for the Petitioner:
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
The Court made the following:
3
VS,J W.P.No.16975 of 2018
ORDER:
Today, when the matter came up for hearing, Mr.N.Chandrashekar Reddy, learned counsel appearing for respondents No.4 and 5, who are the children of the petitioner’s brother, brought to the notice of this Court that the petitioner is no more.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed.
___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA
Date: 07.07.2026. KGR
Whether the order is :
✓ Speaking Yes/No / Recorded Yes/No ✓ Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
C. VENKATA NARSI REDDY
THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
THE JOINT COLLECTOR, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT
THE TAHSILDAR, GORANTLA MANDAL ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT
C NARENDRA REDDY
C HARSHAVARDHAN REDDY
V.SUJATHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
