Anil Kumar Borrugadda Vs Union of Inida — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

Anil Kumar Borrugadda Vs Union of Inida — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 in not conducting an impartial enquiry into the mysterious death of minor girl Kondisetty Prizy on 13-9-2019 at the orphanage of respondent No. 6 in Bandar Taluk, and the registration of FIR No. 266/2019 against the petitioner, was illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Constitution (issue raised in the petition; not adjudicated, as the writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution). +1 more

Ratio / Principle

The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution: none appeared for the petitioner either physically or through video conference though the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', and there was no representation on the previous adjournment either; no order as to costs.

Key takeaways

As a sequel to the dismissal, all interlocutory applications, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.ratio¶¶46

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No.15418 of 2019 (High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati), filed by Anil Kumar Borrugadda under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus declaring illegal the failure of respondent Nos. 4 and 5 (Superintendent of Police and Sub-Inspector, Bandar Taluk) to conduct an impartial enquiry into the mysterious death of minor girl Kondisetty Prizy on 13-9-2019 at the orphanage of respondent No. 6 (B Kiran Paul, Pastor and President, Berachah Ministries Orphan Home), and the registration of FIR No. 266/2019 against the petitioner, and seeking independent-agency investigation of FIR Nos. 262/2019 and 266/2019 of Bandar Taluk Police Station — DISMISSED FOR NON-PROSECUTION on 11.02.2026 by Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi: the petitioner appeared neither physically nor through video conference though the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', and there was no representation on the previous adjournment either; no order as to costs; pending interlocutory applications (IA Nos. 1-3 of 2019 and IA No. 1 of 2020, all under Section 151 CPC) stand closed. No issue on merits was adjudicated and no precedent was cited or relied upon.

APHC010326722019

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

[3368]

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION NO: 15418/2019

Between:

ANIL KUMAR BORRUGADDA, S/O AMRUTHA RAO HINDU MALA AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O FLAT NO.2, BRINDAVAN GARDENS, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH

...PETITIONER

AND

UNION OF INIDA, REP.BY ITS SECETARY MINISTRY OF HOME, CENTRAL SECREIATRATE NEW DELHI

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME ) AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AP

THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KRISHNA DIST, VIJAYAWADA. AP

THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DIST AP

THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, BANDAR TALUK AP

B KIRAN PAUL, ,S/O.NOT KNOWN,AGE 52 YERS, PASTOR AND PRESIDENT OF BERACHAH MINISTRIES, ORPHAN HOME, CHITTIPALEM VILLAGE/PANCHAYATHI, BAIRAGIPALEM MANDAL, MACHILIPATNAM, A.P

...RESPONDENT(S):

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more

2

particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring illegal the action of respondent Nos.4 and 5 in not conducting a impartial enquiry into the mysterious death of minor girl Kondisetty Prizy on 13-9-2019 at Orphanage of respondent No.6 in Bandar Taluk, as also the activities of the Orphanage (FIR 262/2019) and registering a false FIR No. 266/2019 against the petitioner and his social worker as illegal arbitrary and in gross violation of his fundamental rights enshrined in articles 19, 20, 21 and 22 of the Constitution of India, and to direct an investigation by an independent agency of FIR Nos.262/2019 and 266/2019 Bandar Taluk Police Station

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondents No.4 86 5 to submit all the evidence in FIR Nos. 262/2019 and 266/2019 in a sealed cover before this Hon'ble Court to file a report along with the same by not to harass or take coercive steps against the petitioner along with his family members, as well as his team of social workers more particularly K. John Mathew with his family members, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass

IA NO: 2 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no. 2 to 4 to conduct complete investigation in crime no. 262/19, 156/19, 292/19, 287/19, 284/19, 266/19 by in independent agency to submit investigation report in a sealed cover to this Honourable court pending disposal of the W.P.No.15418 of 2019

IA NO: 3 OF 2019

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner to file petitions on behalf of her son namely Anil kumar borrugadda, S/o. Amrutharao, pending disposal of the W.P. No. 15418/2019

IA NO: 1 OF 2020

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct respondent no.1 to 6 not to harass the petitioner and his social workers on the ground of initiation of

3

proceeding bearing No. C.N0.28/HS/SDPO-WD/ 2019, dated 27.10.2019 for Rowdy Sheet as well as initiate action against erring police officers including Ashok Vardhan Sub-registrar Guntur city who is using his official position to influence the police officers to favour of respondent No.6, pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass

Counsel for the Petitioner:

1.A V SWAMY

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

1.GP FOR HOME (AP)

2.DEPUTY SOLICITOR GENERAL OF INDIA

3.K V ADITYA CHOWDARY

The Court made the following:

4

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION No.15418 OF 2019

ORDER:

None appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is listed under the caption 8for dismissal9. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournment also.

Learned counsel representing Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel representing unofficial respondent No.6 and Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance.

In that view of the matter, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.

______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

11.02.2026 Dmr

5

113

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI

WRIT PETITION No:15418 OF 2019

Date: 11.02.2026

W

Dmr