Kota Chakra Pavan Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

KOTA CHAKRA PAVAN KUMAR, S/O KOTA RANGA RAJA PERUMALLU, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, REPRESENTED BY HIS AUTHORIZED PERSON I.E., FATHER BEING THE NATURAL GUARDIAN, R/O D. NO. 2-144, KODURU VILLAGE, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521328

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT E W S WELFARE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238

¶14

STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, FINANCE AND PLANNING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522238

¶15

THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, AP STATE KAPU WELFARE AND DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 12-467, 3RD FLOOR, POTHURI MERCANTILE, NH-16 SERVICE ROAD, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522501

¶16

2

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue writ or order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents particularly 3rd Respondent in not releasing the Financial Assistance Rs. 10,00,000/- for studying abroad under 'Videshi Vidya Deevana Scheme for the year 2018-2019 to my son having been approved of his name with ID OV2018116865 for the said benefit by the State Level Screening Committee as highly illegal, opposed to the Policy Decision of the Government, Arbitrary exercise of power and also opposed to legitimate expectation and consequently direct the respondents to release the financial assistance under the said scheme forthwith to mitigate the hardship of the selected student and pass

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents to release financial assistance of Rs. 10,00,000/(Ten Lakhs)under Videshi Vidhya deevena Scheme to the son of the petitioner Kota Ranga Raja Perumallu forth with under Application ID No.OV2018116865, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass

¶21

IA NO: 2 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased May be permit the petitioner to amend (a). The cause title by replacing the petition in the previous writ Kota Ranga Raja Perumallu ” with Kota Chakra Pavan Kumar Rep by this authorized person i.e father being natural guardian, Kota Ranga Raja Perumallu. (B). The

¶23

3

¶24

averments at para no. 2 of the writ by replacing to my son with to me in spite of my eligibility. (C). The prayer of the writ by replacing “ to my son with to the petitioner and pass

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26

1.SINGARAJU MAHASWETHA VARMA

¶27

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶28

1.GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE

¶29

2.Chejarla Venkateswara rao SC For A.P.Kapu welfare and developement Corp.LTD

¶30

3.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING

¶31

The Court made the following:

¶32

4

¶33

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY

¶34

W.P.No.1498 OF 2026

¶35

O R D E R:

¶36

The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not releasing financial assistance of Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only), sanctioned to the Petitioner (Application I.D. No.OV2018116865) under „Videshi Vidya Deevana‟ Overseas Scholarship scheme, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶37

The Petitioner had applied for financial assistance under „Videshi Vidya Deevana‟ Overseas Scholarship scheme for the academic year 2018-2019 and the same was allotted with Application I.D. No.OV2018116865. After due verification, Respondent No.3 sanctioned Rs.10,00,000/- (Rupees Ten Lakhs only) in favour of the Petitioner for pursuing Masters in Computer Science Course at University of Dayton, United States of America in two (02) installments. Though, the Petitioner had completed his Masters in Computer Science Course, the financial assistance as promised to the Petitioner was not disbursed to him. Hence, the present Writ Petition is

¶38

5

¶39

filed.

¶40

3. Learned Standing Counsel for Respondent

¶41

No.3/Corporation submits that the application of the Petitioner would be considered and amounts would be sanctioned, if the Petitioner is within the conditions specified, for release of the amounts.

¶42

Considering the submissions, this Writ Petition is disposed of, with the following directions:-

¶43

(i) The Respondents are directed to examine the claim of the Petitioner within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶44

(ii) In the event, the claim of the Petitioner is held to be in order, the Respondents are directed to release the amounts to the Petitioner within a further period of eight (08) weeks.

¶45