Dismissed¶30

Rai Thimmappa v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC26 Jan 2026WP/1434/2026

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; Form 6-A application dated 21-10-2025; mutation of petitioner's name in revenue records; deletion of 5th respondent Rai Gowraiah; Ac.2-30 cents / Ac.04-59 cents in Sy.No.36-3; Theetakal Revenue Village; Brahma Samudram Mandal; Anantapuramu District; Tahsildar; AP.Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; IA No. 1 of 2026; interim order deemed vacated; no order as to costs; Justice B Krishna Mohan; 27.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

In view of learned counsel for the petitioner seeking withdrawal, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn; interim order, if any, is deemed to have been vacated; there shall be no order as to costs. ¶30

Rai Thimmappa Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3233]

¶2

APHC010014962026

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 1434/2026

¶9

Between:

¶10

RAI THIMMAPPA, S/O R.POLENNA, AGE ABOUT 70 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O H.NO.3-109, RAYALAPPADODDI THEETAKAL VILLAGE, BRAHMA SAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT -515763.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI 522503.

¶14

THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, , ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT AT ANANTAPURAMU - 515001.

¶15

THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, BRAHMA SAMUDRAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515767.

¶16

THE TAHSILDAR, BRAHMA SAMUDRAM MANDAL AT BRAHMA SAMUDRAM, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515767.

¶17

RAI GOWRAIAH, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGE ABOUT MAJOR YEARS, R/O RAYALAPPADODDI THEETAKAL VILLAGE, BRAHMA SAMUDRAM MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT - 515763.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in keeping the petitoner's application in Form 6-A dated 21-10-2025 without considering the same for delition from the 5th respondent to an extent of Ac.2-30 cents in Sy.No.36-3, situated at Theetakal Revenue Village, Brahma Samudram Mandal, Anantapuramu District, as illegal, arbitrary and violation of AP.Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 and consequently direct the respondents to consider the application in Form 6-A dated 21-102025 for mutation of petitioner's name in the revenue records in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.04-59 cents in Sy.No.36-3, situated at Theetakal Revenue Village, Brahma Samudram Mandal, Anantapuramu District and to pass

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2026

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents to consider the application in Form 6-A dated 21-10-2025 for mutation of petitioner's name in the revenue records in respect of the land to an extent of Ac.04- 59 cents in Sy.No.36-3, situated at Theetakal Revenue Village, Brahma Samudram Mandal, Anantapuramu District, pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass

¶23

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶24

1.U RAMANJANEYULU

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶26

1.GP FOR REVENUE

¶27

¶28

The Court made the following Order:

¶29

The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the writ petition.

¶30

In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶31

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶32

_________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶33

27.01.2026 NNN

Rai Thimmappa v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rai Thimmappa v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rayanki Yashwanth Kumar Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Mastangari Rangamma Vs the State of Ap

Shaik Zubair Vs the State of Ap

Settippalle Arjun Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Devanaboyina Ramakrishna Rao Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Konamakulla Sreenivasulu Vs the State of Ap