Dismissed¶39

Shaik Zubair v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC21 Jan 2026WP/21915/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Withdrawal of writ petition; dismissal as withdrawn; Article 226; Stamps and Registration Department; District Registrar Tirupathi; notice No.G/1755/2024 dated 03.09.2024; proposed enquiry for cancellation of Registered Document No.3959 of 2024 dated 06.04.2024; interim order dated 01.10.2024 deemed vacated; no costs; miscellaneous petitions closed; no merits decided; Shaik Zubair; Shaik Gousiya; Nalladimmu Subbamma; Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; B Krishna Mohan, J.; decided 22.01.2026.

What did the court decide?

None on merits; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, interim order if any deemed vacated, no order as to costs, and pending miscellaneous petitions closed. ¶39

Shaik Zubair Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3233]

¶2

APHC010429182024

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

THURSDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 21915/2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

SHAIK ZUBAIR, S/O.SHAIK RUSTHUM AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC-BUSINESS R/O.H.NO.9-245-3, CHINTAM NAGAR RAILWAY KODURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P.

¶11

SHAIK GOUSIYA, W/O.SHAIK ZUBAIR AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC- HOUSEWIFE R/O.H.NO.9-245-3, CHINTAM NAGAR RAILWAY KODURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S)

¶12

AND

¶13

THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY STAMPS AND REGISTRATION DEPARTMENT A.P.SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶14

THE COMMISSIONER AND INSPECTOR GENERAL OF STAMPS AND REGISTRATION, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P.

¶15

THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, TIRUPATHI, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P.

¶16

THE SUBREGISTRAR, PAKALA, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT, A.P.

¶17

NALLADIMMU SUBBAMMA, W/O.LATE VENKAT REDDY AGED MAJOR, OCCHOUSEWIFE R/O.H.NO.5-156, POOJA INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL CHOWDURU, KADAPA DISTRICT.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toPleased to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the Impugned Notice issued by the 3rd respondent bearing No.G/1755/2024, dt.03.09.2024 whereby proposing to conduct enquiry at the instance of the 5th respondent for cancellation of the Registered Doc.No.3959 of 2024, dt.06.04.2024 executed by the petitioner in favour of the 2nd petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and contrary to the provisions of Indian Registration Act and without jurisdiction and consequently by setting aside the Impugned Notice of the 3rd respondent dt.03.09.2024, direct the Respondent Nos.2 to 4 not to

¶20

¶21

proceed with the proposed enquiry for cancellation of the 2nd petitioners registered document at the instance of the respondent by directing the parties to approach the competent civil court, and to pass

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2024

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to Stay all further proceedings including the enquiry pursuance to the Impugned Notice bearing No.G/1755/2024, dt.03.09.2024 issued by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass.

¶24

IA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶25

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 01-10- 2024 in I.A.No 1of 2024 in WP No.21915 of 2024 and dismiss the writ petition and pass

¶26

IA NO: 2 OF 2025

¶27

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to vacate the interim order dated 01.10.2024 in lA No 1 of 2024 in WP No 21915 of 2024 and dismiss the above writ petition with exemplary costs, in the interest of justice and pass

¶28

IA NO: 3 OF 2025

¶29

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased direct to initiate proceedings for conducting an enquiry in accordance with law and prosecute the writ petitioners herein in accordance with law for the offences committed by them in the interest of justice and pass

¶30

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶31

1.SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA

¶32

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶33

1.SUDHAKARA RAO AMBATI

¶34

2.GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS

¶35

¶36

The Court made the following Order:

¶37

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing for the 5^th respondent.

¶38

The learned counsel for the petitioners produces the letter from the petitioners dated 31.12.2025 for withdrawal of the writ petition. The said letter shall be made as part of the court record.

¶39

In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶40

As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.

¶41

_________________________ JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN

¶42

22.01.2026 NNN

Shaik Zubair v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shaik Zubair v. the State of Ap

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K Sahadeva Vs the State of Ap

L Rama Murthy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Gurrapusala Yedukondalu Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Koruprolu Simhachalam, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Velamala Jagadeeswara Rao Vs the State of Ap

Alavala Narasimha Reddy Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh