Allowed¶4

M/s. Kp Groups, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC20 Jan 2026WP/13960/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Interlocutory order, Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; NV, J; W.P. No. 13960 of 2024; I.A.No.1 of 2026; extension of time; vacate ATM; temple premises of 4th respondent; prior order dated 21.01.2026; final extension; no further extension of time.

What did the court decide?

Three more months' time granted to vacate the ATM from the 4th respondent temple premises, with a clarification that no further extension will be granted under any circumstances. ¶4

Why is it important?

M/s. Kp Groups, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

MAIN CASE No.: W.P.No. 13960 OF 2024

¶3

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶4

Sl.No	DATE	ORDER	OFFICE NOTE
20	21.04.2026	NV, J I.A.No.1 of 2026 This interlocutory application is filed to extend 3 more months time to vacate ATM from 4^threspondent temple premises fixed by the Hon’ble High Court vie order in W.P.No.13960 of 2024 dated 21.01.2026. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit, I.A.No.1 of 2026 is ordered. It is clarified that the petitioner is not entitled for further extension of time under any circumstances.
		______ NV, J SP

M/s. Kp Groups, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

M/s. Kp Groups, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Settipalli Narasimha Rao Vs the State of Ap

Daddanala Santhi Sree Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh

Katam Reddy Sasidhar Reddy Vs Sashi Bhusan Kumar IAS

T. Karunakar Reddy Vs Bhanu Prakash Reddy

Kottapalli Krishna Kumari Vs Sri Swapnil Dinkar Pundkar IAS

M/s Nhavadirr Constructions Agency Vs Sri G Sai Prasad