Dismissed¶34

Seekoti Appa Rao, v. the Registrar (Admn) High Court of Ap., and 2 Others

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Feb 2026WP/38458/2012

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for default of W.P. 38458/2012 (Seekoti Appa Rao v. Registrar Admn., High Court of A.P. and others); challenge to disciplinary confirmation orders in D(D)A. No 01/2012 C.4(Con.) dt. 12.04.2012 read with File Nos. 71 of 2005 and 84 of 2008 dt. 17.01.2011 under A.P.C.S. (CCA) Rules 1991; interim reinstatement plea (IA No. 1 of 2012) lapses with the petition; no merits adjudication; no costs.

What did the court decide?

As there was no appearance for the petitioner either on 19.01.2026 or on the date of the present order, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. ¶34

Seekoti Appa Rao, Vs the Registrar (Admn)… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3529]

¶2

APHC010772782012

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 38458/2012

¶10

Between:

¶11

SEEKOTI APPA RAO,, OCC: COMPULSARLY RETIRED EMPLOYEE R/O D. NO 11-4-129, RADHALAPETA, PITHAPURAM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶12

...PETITIONER

¶13

AND

¶14

THE REGISTRAR ADMN HIGH COURT OF AP AND 2 OTHERS, HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HIGH COURT HYDERABAD

¶15

THE DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY CUM DISTRICT JUDGE, RAJAHMUNDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶16

THE ENQUIRY OFFICER CUM SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAZOLE, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶17

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ, order or direction directing to produce records and to delcare the orders in D(D)A. No 01/2012 C.4(Con.) dated 12.04.2012 issued by the 1st Respondent and File No 71 of 2005 and File No 84 of 2008 dated 17.01.2011, thereby conforming the orders of the 2nd Respondent bad in law, and illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provision of A.P.C.S. (CCA) Rules 1991 and may pass such order or

¶19

¶20

orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.

¶21

IA NO: 1 OF 2012(WPMP 48783 OF 2012

¶22

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No 1 and 2 to reinstate the petitioner as Record Assistant under the control of the Junior Civil Judge: Razole, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court deem fit and proper in the circumsatances of the case.

¶23

IA NO: 4 OF 2012(WPMP 211631 OF 2012

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶25

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶26