Disposed¶24

Bhavya Health Services Pvt. Ltd., v. Apgenco., Rep. by Md., Hyd., & Another

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Jan 2026WP/11610/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

WP 11610/2014, Bhavya Health Services Pvt Ltd v. APGENCO and Chief General Managing HR, A.P.GENCO (High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, 05.01.2026, Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad, J): writ petition disposed of as infructuous on counsel's submission; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications, if any, closed; I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2023 allowed (condonation of 70-day delay for leave to file counter-affidavit). No merits decided; no statutes or precedents cited.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous, with no order as to costs. ¶24

Bhavya Health Services Pvt. Ltd., Vs Apgenco., Rep. by Md., Hyd., & Another — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010384702014

¶2

[3328]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014

¶9

Between:

¶10

BHAVYA HEALTH SERVICES PVT LTD.,, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, DR.D.PAVAN KUMAR, S/OD.V.P.S.R.CH.PRASAD AGED 40 YEARS. SAIBALARAM RESIDENCY, SRI RAMNAGAR, BEHIND JYOTHIMAHAL THEATRE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

APGENCO REP BY MD HYD ANOTHER, LIMITED (APGENCO), REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, VIDYUTSOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD.

¶14

CHIEF GENERAL MANAGING HR, A.P.GENCO, VIDYUTSOUDHA, SOMAJIGUDA, HYDERABAD.

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶17

1.N BHARAT BABU

¶18

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶19

1.M. VIDYASAGAR, ( STANDING COUNSEL FOR APGENCO )

¶20

2.V SESHA KUMARI

¶21

The Court made the following:

¶22

ORAL ORDER:

¶23

Ms. E. Somasree, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri N. Bharat Babu, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that this case has become infructuous.

¶24

Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs.

¶25

Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order.

¶26

_________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J

Dt: 05.01.2026

DSV

104

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶31

WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014

¶32

05.01.2026

¶33

DSV

¶34

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATHI

¶35

MAIN CASE No. WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014

¶36

PROCEEDING SHEET

¶37

Sl. No	DATE	ORDER	Office Note
2.	05.01.2026	GRKP, J
		I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2023
		I.A.No.1 of 2023 is filed seeking leave to grant permission for filing Counter-Affidavit. On account of the delay, I.A.No.2 of 2023 is filed seeking condonation of delay of 70 days in representing the Leave Petition bearing I.A.No.1 of 2023. 2. This Court has considered the contents of the Affidavits filed in both Interlocutory Application Nos.1 and 2 of 2023. 3. Having considered the averments in the Affidavit, this Court deems it appropriate to condone the delay of 70 days in representing the Leave Petition in I.A.No.2 of 2023. 4. This Court is also satisfied with the explanation given in the Affidavit filed in support of Interlocutory Application No.1 of 2023. 5. Accordingly, I.A.Nos.1 and 2 of 2023 are allowed. ___________ GRKP, J	Contd.

¶38

	WRIT PETITION NO: 11610/2014
	Writ Petition is disposed of as Infructuous. (vide separate order)
DSV	___________ GRKP, J

Bhavya Health Services Pvt. Ltd., v. Apgenco., Rep. by Md., Hyd., & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Bhavya Health Services Pvt. Ltd., v. Apgenco., Rep. by Md., Hyd., & Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mr.Atluri Venkateswara Rao Vs Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation

Sri Venkateswara Rice and Floor Mill Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

M/S Adani Wilmar Limited, Kurnool Dist & Another Vs Chairman, Aperc, Hyd & 5 Ot

V.Rabbani Basha Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Sagittal Infra Projects Vs the State of Ap

Pendela Chandrakala Vs the State of Andhra Pradesh