Dismissed¶32

K. Lakshmi Prasanna v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC10 Feb 2026WP/10290/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC010232882019; WP 10290/2019; K. Lakshmi Prasanna v. State of AP & others; Tirupati Urban; M.R.Palli Police Station; Mittapalli Raghurami Reddy; non-registration of Crime; complaint dated 08.07.2019; Article 226 mandamus; Articles 14 and 21; Section 151 CPC interim application; dismissed for non-prosecution; petitioner absent; listed 'for dismissal'; pending IAs closed; Justice B.V.L.N. Chakravarthi; 11.02.2026; no costs.

What did the court decide?

Ground of dismissal: none appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference though the matter was listed under the caption 'for dismissal', and there had been no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournments also. ¶30

K. Lakshmi Prasanna Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

[3368]

¶2

APHC010232882019

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI

¶7

WRIT PETITION NO: 10290/2019

¶8

Between:

¶9

K. LAKSHMI PRASANNA, W/O. OM PRAKASH, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. DURGASAMUDRAM(V), TIRUPATI RURAL MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER AND

¶11

THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶12

SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICEURBAN, TIRUPATI URBAN, TIRUPATI.

¶13

STATION HOUSE OFFICER, M.R.PALLI P.S.. , M.R.PALLI,CHITTOOR DIST.,

¶14

MITTAPALLI RAGHURAMI REDDY, S/O. M.R.REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. DURGASAMUDRAM(V),TIRUPATI(R) MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT

¶15

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶16

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of the Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not registering a Crime pursuant to complaint dated 08.07.2019 of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and

¶17

¶18

consequently direct the respondents to register a Crime pursuant to complaint dated 08.07.2019 of the petitioner forthwith

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2019

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent to register a Crime against 4th respondent pursuant to complaint dt.08.07.2019 of the petitioner forthwith pending disposal of the Writ Petition and to pass

¶21

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶22

1.SRINIVASULU KURRA

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶24

1.GP FOR HOME (AP)

¶25

The Court made the following:

¶26

¶27

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI

¶28

WRIT PETITION No.10290 OF 2019

¶29

ORDER:

¶30

None appeared for the writ petitioner either physically or through video conference, though the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’. There was no representation for the petitioner on the previous adjournments also.

¶31