Pasupuleti Malyadri, Guntur Dt., Vs Sankara Ravindra Babu, Guntur & Anr, Rep Pp.

¶1

APHC010861152017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶2

[3368]

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2659/2017

¶7

Between:

¶8

PASUPULETI MALYADRI, GUNTUR DT.,, S/O. KONDAIAH, R/O. D.NO.10-60-25, AMARAVATHI PLOTS, CHECHUPET, TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶9

...PETITIONER

¶10

AND

¶11

SANKARA RAVINDRA BABU GUNTUR ANR REP PP, S/O ANDJANEYULU, R/O MORRISPET, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.

¶12

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, HYDERABAD.

¶13

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶14

Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto file this criminal revision petition against the Judgment and sentence passed by the court of the XI Addl. Sessions & District Judge; at Tenali, Guntur District, Dated. 16-10-2017, in Cri.A. No. 656 of 2015, by Conforming the judgment and sentence passed by the court of the Principal Junior Civil Judge, at Tenali, Guntur District, Dated. 21-11-2015, In C.C.No.276/2012, for the following grounds among other:

¶15

IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 4350 OF 2017

¶16

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶17

2

¶18

IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 5090 OF 2017

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the sentence of imprisonmentpassed by the court of the XI ASDJ,Tenali,Guntur Dist, Dt 16.10.2017 in Crl.A.No 656 of 2015, by comfirming the judgment and sentence passed by by the court of the PJCJ,Tenail,Guntur Dist, Dt: 21.11.2015 in CC.No 276/2012 and to release the petitioner on bail pending disposalof the CrlRC before this Hon'ble Court, in the interest of justice.

¶20

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶21

1.CHALLA SRINIVASA REDDY

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent(S):

¶23

1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

3

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.2659 of 2017

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

Sri Yattapu Bharath Kumar Reddy, learned counsel

¶29

representing Sri Challa Srinivasa Reddy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner, would submit that the revision petitioner is no more.

¶30

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the 2^nd respondent–State is in attendance.

¶31

In view of the submission made by the learned counsel representing the revision petitioner and since none of the legal representatives of the deceased revision petitioner had come forward seeking leave to continue the present criminal revision case as contemplated under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the criminal revision case stands abated as against the revision petitioner under Section 394 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

¶32