Dismissed¶29

Tati Gurusharath Yadav v. the Joint Collector(Civil Supplies)

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Apr 2026CRLP/90/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, Criminal Petition No. 90 of 2024 (CNR-style No. APHC010000362024), Tati Gurusharath Yadav v. Joint Collector Civil Supplies, Rayachoty and others; quash petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C./Section 528 BNSS against proceedings in Crl.M.P.No.462 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.129 of 2023 before the Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa; no representation for petitioner; appeal already dismissed; petition held infructuous and dismissed; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; decided 02.04.2026 by Dr. Justice Y. Lakshmana Rao.

What did the court decide?

Since the underlying Criminal Appeal (Crl.A. No. 129 of 2023) has already been dismissed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, the Criminal Petition has become infructuous. ¶28

Tati Gurusharath Yadav Vs the Joint Collector(Civil Supplies) — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010000362024

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3521]

¶5

THURSDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO

¶8

CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 90/2024

¶9

Between:

¶10

TATI GURUSHARATH YADAV, S/O. GURRAPPA YADAV, HINDU, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O. VIJAYANAGARAM STREET, PRODDATUR TOWN AND MANDAL, YSR DISTRICT.

¶11

...PETITIONER/ACCUSED

¶12

AND

¶13

THE JOINT COLLECTORCIVIL SUPPLIES, RAYACHOTY, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

¶14

THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHINNAMANDEM P.S., ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

¶15

THE TAHSILDAR, CHINNAMANDEM MANDAL, ANNAMAYYA DISTRICT.

¶16

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS P.P. HIGH COURT OF AT AMARAVATHI.

¶17

...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S):

¶18

Counsel for the Petitioner/accused:

¶19

1.POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA

¶20

Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S):

¶21

1.GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES

¶22

2.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP)

¶23

¶24

The Court made the following: ORDER :

¶25

The Criminal Petition has been filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for brevity ‘the Cr.P.C.,’)/Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for brevity ‘the BNSS’) seeking to quash proceedings against Petitioner/Appellant in Crl.M.P.No.462 of 2023 in Crl.A.No.129 of 2023 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa.

¶26

No representation for the Petitioner.

¶27

Sri A. Sai Rohith, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor, submits that Crl.A. No. 129 of 2023 on the file of the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, itself has already been dismissed. Hence, nothing survives in this Petition.

¶28

In view of the fact that the Criminal Appeal itself has been dismissed by the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Kadapa, this Criminal Petition has become infructuous.

¶29