Dismissed¶¶30

Sri P.v.Appa Rao v. Sri Nammi Appa Rao

Andhra Pradesh HC19 Jul 2026CMA/828/2010

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

CMA No. 828 of 2010, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, Balaji Medamalli J., decided 20.07.2026; P.V. Appa Rao v. Nammi Appa Rao; appeal against order dated 29.07.2010 of 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, Visakhapatnam in IA.No. 154/2010 in OS.No. 1351/2008; ex-parte decree setting aside sought; Section 151 CPC miscellaneous petitions; interim stay of 7-10-2010 conditioned on deposit of 50% of decretal amount with interest and costs; applications to vacate interim order, extend time, and cross-examine P.W.1 and P.W.2; dismissal for non-prosecution despite service of notice; no costs; interim orders and miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

None; the appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution with no costs, and miscellaneous petitions and earlier interim orders stand closed. ¶¶30

Sri P.v.Appa Rao Vs Sri Nammi Appa Rao — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

APHC010464892010

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

MONDAY, THE 20^th DAY OF JULY 2026

¶4

PRESENT

¶5

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶6

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 828 OF 2010

¶7

Between:

¶8

Sri P.V.Appa Rao, S/o. Late Appa rao, R/o. Goutami Gardens, Jyothinagar, Marripalem,

¶9

...Petitioner

¶10

AND

¶11

Sri Nammi Appa Rao, S/o. Late Pydayya R/o. D.No. 11-147, Main Road, Opp: Mouriya Theatre, Gopala Patnam,

¶12

...Respondent

¶13

Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto set aside the order dated 29.07.2010 passed by 1st Additional Senior Civil Jduge, Visakhapatnam, in IA.No. 154/2010 in OS.No. 1351/2008 and allow the appeal by allowing the appellant to an opportunity to contest his case by setting aside the Ex-parte decree passed in OS.No. 1351/2010

¶14

IA NO: 1 OF 2010(CMAMP 2045 OF 2010

¶15

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in OS.No. 1351/2008 including execution proceedings pending the disposal of the bove Civil Miscellaneous Appeal

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2011(CMAMP 152 OF 2011

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time for 12 more weeks from 19-11-2010 to 9-2-2011 to comply order passed in CMAMP No. 2045in CMA NO. 828 of 2010 dt. 7-10-2010 for the depositing of 50% of decretal amount to gether with interest and costs and pass

¶18

IA NO: 1 OF 2013(CMAMP 1443 OF 2013

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To vacate the interim order, dated 7/10/2010 passed in CMA.MP.No.2045 of 2010 in CMA.No. 828 of 2010 and dismiss the petition with costs in the interest of justice and pass

¶20

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 1514 OF 2014

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the time granted on 10/12/2013 in CMA.No. 828 of 2010 for a further period of 3 months to dispose of OS.No. 1351 of 2008 on the file of the 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge, visakhapatnam

¶22

IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CMAMP 320 OF 2015

¶23

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the court below to permit the cross-examine the P.W.1 & 2 and complete the same on the same day

¶24

Counsel for the Petitioner: .

¶25

Counsel for the Respondent G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent6963/G L NAGESWAR RAO

¶26

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶27

ORDER:

¶28

On 17.06.2026, this Coordinate Bench of this Court ordered the Registry to issue fresh notice to the appellant. Pursuant thereto, a postal endorsement dated 20.06.2026 was received, evidencing service of notice on the appellant. Despite service of notice, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant today.

¶29