Maddi Sreenivasa Rao v. Sriram Malleswara Rao & 2 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
AP High Court Amaravati, CMA No. 208/2015, decided 06.01.2026 by Justices Ravi Nath Tilhari and Maheswara Rao Kuncheam; appeal dismissed for want of prosecution, no representation for appellant, matter of 2015 listed as 'old matters'; underlying dispute: father's custody petition for minor children under Sections 9 & 10 of Guardian and Wards Act; impugned order dated 29-12-2014 in GWOP No. 18 of 2012, I-Additional District Judge, Ongole; appellant Maddi Sreenivasa Rao (counsel Venkateswarlu Chakkilam); respondents Sriram Malleswara Rao, Sriram Siva Nageswara Rao and Sriram Rama Subbamma.
What did the court decide?
The Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for 'want of prosecution', there having been no representation for the appellant and the matter, pertaining to the year 2015, having been listed under the caption 'old matters'.