Dismissed¶31

Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation v. M/S. Paramounts Studio

Andhra Pradesh HC1 Mar 2026CMA/164/2009

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; CMA No. 164/2009; ESI Corporation (Regional Director, Hyderabad) v. M/s Paramounts Studio, Guntur; appeal against Labour Court, Guntur order dated 16.10.2006 in E.S.I. No. 5 of 1999; dismissed for want of prosecution; no representation for appellant; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed as sequel; IA No. 1 of 2007 (CMAMP 1243 of 2007) Section 151 CPC condonation of 87 days' delay; decided 02.03.2026; bench Ravi Nath Tilhari J and Balaji Medamalli J; counsel U.R.P. Srinivas.

What did the court decide?

As there was no representation for the appellant, the court dismissed the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal for want of prosecution. ¶30

Regional Director, E.S.I. Corporation Vs M/S. Paramounts Studio — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

¶2

(RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.164 OF 2009)

¶3

APHC010180922009

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶5

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

[3572]

¶7

MONDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶8

PRESENT

¶9

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶10

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE BALAJI MEDAMALLI

¶11

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 164/2009

¶12

Between:

¶13

REGIONAL DIRECTOR, E.S.I. CORPORATION, E.S.I. CORPORATION, HYDERABAD.

¶14

...APPELLANT

¶15

AND

¶16

M/S PARAMOUNTS STUDIO, Represented by its managing partner Thomas Sebastain, Brodipet Road, Guntur District.

¶17

...RESPONDENT

¶18

Appeal Under Section_____against orders

¶19

IA NO: 1 OF 2007(CMAMP 1243 OF 2007

¶20

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of 87 days in filing the above appeal, in the interest of justice

¶21

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶22

1.U.R.P. SRINIVAS

¶23

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶24

1..

¶25

¶26

(RNT,J & BM,J CMA. NO.164 OF 2009)

¶27

The Court made the following:

¶28

JUDGMENT:- (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶29

This appeal has been filed by the appellant/respondent-Corporation, challenging the order dated 16.10.2006 passed in E.S.I.No.5 of 1999 on the file of the Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Guntur.

¶30