Dismissed¶29

Shaik Abdul Raheem, Guntur v. Syed Raheem, Guntur

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Jan 2026CMA/1085/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal of Civil Miscellaneous Appeal as infructuous; guardianship/custody dispute between father (appellant Shaik Abdul Raheem) and maternal uncle (respondent Syed Raheem); Guardian OP No. 728 of 2011 under Sections 8 & 10 of the Guardian and Wards Act; order dated 11.08.2014 by III Additional District Judge, Guntur appointing maternal uncle as guardian of minor children challenged by father; minors attained majority during pendency of appeal; interim custody petitions under Section 151 CPC; no order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.

What did the court decide?

Since the minor children had attained majority during the pendency of the appeal, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed as infructuous. ¶29

Shaik Abdul Raheem, Guntur Vs Syed Raheem, Guntur — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3524]

¶2

APHC010717522014

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

TUESDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶8

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1085/2014

¶9

Between:

¶10

SHAIK ABDUL RAHEEM, GUNTUR, S/O SHAIK MOHD KHASIM, AGED: 43 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O D. NO. 20-1-45/1, PONNUR. GUNTUR.

¶11

...APPELLANT

¶12

AND

¶13

SYED RAHEEM GUNTUR, S/o Moula Ali, Aged: 49 years, Occ: D. No. 26-3-13, Opp: Stalls Girls High School, Nagarampalem, Guntur.

¶14

...RESPONDENT

¶15

Appeal Under Section_____against ordersto allow the appeal and set aside the order dated 11.08.2014 passed in GW OP NO.728 of 2011 by the III dditional District Judge, Guntur, Consequently grnt interim custody of the minors to the petitioner and allow the petitioner to hold the minors' custody on every Sunday, in the interest of justice and pass

¶16

IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CMAMP 1833 OF 2014

¶17

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent herein to give the interim custody of the minors to the Petitioner and allow the petitioner to hold the minors' custody on every Sunday, in the interest of justice and pass

¶18

IA NO: 4 OF 2014(CMAMP 38618 OF 2014

¶19

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased

¶20

Counsel for the Appellant:

¶21

1.M A K MUKHEED

¶22

Counsel for the Respondent:

¶23

¶24

The Court made the following:

¶25

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1085/2014

¶26

JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari)

¶27

The Guardian OP.No.728 of 2011 has been filed by the maternal uncle/ respondent herein seeking to appoint him as guardian of minor children under Section 8 & 10 of Guardian and Wards Act. The same was allowed by learned III Additional District Judge, Guntur. Aggrieved by the same, the present appeal was preferred by the father.

¶28