Disposed¶25

Md.Abdul Mansur, v. B.Raja Shekar

Andhra Pradesh HC4 Mar 2026CC/769/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court at Amaravati, Contempt Case No. 769 of 2018, decided 05.03.2026 by Justice Maheswara Rao Kuncheam. MD.Abdul Mansur (petitioner, counsel M Rajeswari) v. B Raja Shekar and Y Madhusudan Reddy (contemnors, counsel Banda Prasada Rao, SC for TSAIDC). Alleged wilful disobedience of interim orders dated 08.06.2017 in W.P.M.P. No. 22439 of 2017 in W.P. No. 18379 of 2017 (Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao); petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971. Main writ petition dismissed as infructuous by final order dated 25.07.2025; contempt case closed, no order as to costs, pending applications closed.

What did the court decide?

Contempt case closed without punishing the contemnors; no order as to costs; all pending applications stand closed. ¶25

Md.Abdul Mansur, Vs B.Raja Shekar — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

APHC010220202018

¶2

[3504]

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

THURSDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 769/2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

MD.ABDUL MANSUR,, OCCUPATION SENIOR ACCOUNTANT, 0/O REGIONAL MANAGER, AP STATE AGRO INDUSTRIES DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD. COMPOUND ROAD, NELLOR DISTRICT, AP

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

B RAJA SHEKAR, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER OCC SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT (AGRI) STATE AGRO, AGRICULTURE AND CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETERAIT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.

¶13

Y MADHUSUDAN REDDY, S/O. NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, VICE CHAIRMAN AND MANAGING DIRECTOR STALIN COMPOURID, 5TH FLOOR, AUTONAGAR TERMINAL, STREET NO.2, VIJAYAWADA

¶14

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶15

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the respondents under Contempt of Court Act for voilation of the dated dated 08-06-2017 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 22439 of 2017 in W.P. No. 18379 of 2017 by His Lordship's Hon'ble Sri. Justice M.S. Ramachandra Rao for willful disobedience and violations and pass

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶17

1.M RAJESWARI

¶18

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶19

1.BANDA PRASADA RAO(SC FOR TSAIDC)

¶20

¶21

The court made the following ORDER :

¶22

The contempt case has been filed alleging wilful disobedience of the interim orders dated 08.06.2017 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 22439 of 2017 in W.P. No. 18379 of 2017.

¶23

When the matter is called, there is no representation on either side.

¶24

On the perusal of copy of final order dated 25.07.2025 passed in W.P.No.18379 of 2017, placed by the Registry, it appears that the main writ petition itself was dismissed as infructuous, recording the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶25

In view of the above position, the contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed.

¶26

_______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

Date: 05.03.2026 GVK

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM

¶31

CONTEMPT CASE No.769 of 2018

¶32

Date: 05.03.2026