Disposed¶24

K. Venkatesulu v. Sri Rammohan, commissioner

Andhra Pradesh HC5 Apr 2026CC/513/2011

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Contempt Case No. 513/2011; K. Venkatesulu v. Sri Rammohan, Commissioner, Yemmiganur and C Vittopba; contempt alleging violation of interim orders dated 01.10.2010 in W.P.No.24387 of 2010; main writ petition disposed of on 28.04.2022 by learned Single Judge; contempt case held not to survive and closed; no order as to costs; interlocutory applications closed; decided 06.04.2026 by Justice Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad.

What did the court decide?

Since the main Writ Petition (W.P.No.24387 of 2010) itself was disposed of on 28.04.2022, the Contempt Case complaining of violation of the Interim Orders dated 01.10.2010 in that Writ Petition does not survive. ¶23

K. Venkatesulu Vs Sri Rammohan, commissioner — Andhra Pradesh HC (2026) — LawSathi Research

¶1

[3328]

¶2

APHC010757582011

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

MONDAY,THE SIXTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD

¶8

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 513/2011

¶9

Between:

¶10

K. VENKATESULU, S/O. LATE K. NAGAPPA R/O. H.NO. 1/2191, WEAVERS COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT

¶11

...PETITIONER

¶12

AND

¶13

SRI RAMMOHAN COMMISSIONER, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT

¶14

C VITTOPBA, S/O. ADENNA R/O. H.NO. 1/2192, WEAVERS COLONY, YEMMIGANUR, KURNOOL DISTRICT

¶15

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶16

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶17

1.K NARSI REDDY

¶18

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶19

1.MD SALEEM (SC-MC,RSEEMA,SPSR NLR)

¶20

The Court made the following:

¶21

ORAL ORDER:

¶22

It transpires from record that the Writ Petition bearing W.P.No.24387 of 2010 was disposed of by the learned Single Judge of this Court vide Order dated 28.04.2022.

¶23

Since the main Writ Petition itself has been disposed of on 28.04.2022, this Contempt Case filed complaining of the violation of the Interim Orders dated 01.10.2010 in W.P.No.24387 of 2010 does not survive. The Order dated 28.04.2022 is taken on record.

¶24