Disposed¶27

G Mangamma v. P Raja Babu

Andhra Pradesh HC22 Feb 2026CC/2174/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court contempt case closed after reported compliance; G Mangamma v. P Raja Babu (District Collector, Chittoor), C Kirthi (Sub-Collector, Madanapalli), T Sitaram (Tahsildar, Baireddipalli Mandal), T Mallappa (VRO, Belupalli); non-implementation of order dated 02.07.2020 in W.P.No.10648 of 2020; Sections 10 to 12, Contempt of Courts Act 1971; Chittoor district; liberty to revive contempt case if cause subsists; no order as to costs; Justice D Ramesh; 23.02.2026.

What did the court decide?

No punishment imposed; contempt case closed, with liberty to the petitioners to file an application to revive it if the cause still subsists; no order as to costs. ¶27

G Mangamma Vs P Raja Babu — Contempt of Court | Andhra Pradesh HC (2026)

¶1

¶2

APHC010508972021

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3208] (Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

MONDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX

¶5

PRESENT

¶6

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH

¶7

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2174/2021

¶8

Between:

¶9

G MANGAMMA, W/O NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, R/O AKULAKOTHURU VILLAGE, BELUPALLI POST, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶10

...PETITIONER

¶11

AND

¶12

P RAJA BABU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, AGED MAJOR, OCC. DISTRICT COLLECTOR, DISTRICT COLLECTORATE, CHITTOOR.

¶13

C KIRTHI, AGED MAJOR, OCC. SUB-COLLECTOR, MADANAPALLI, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶14

T SITARAM, S/O NOT KNOWN TO PETITIONER, OCC. TAHSILDAR, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶15

T MALLAPPA, VRO, BELUPALLI REVENUE VILLAGE, BAIREDDIPALLI MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.

¶16

...CONTEMNOR(S):

¶17

¶18

Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to may be pleased to punish the respondents for his willful disobedience of orders Dt. 02.07.2020 passed in W.P.No. 10648 of 2020 on the file of this Honourable Court and pass such

¶19

Counsel for the Petitioner:

¶20

1.KODATI RAMYA KRISHNA

¶21

Counsel for the Contemnor(S):

¶22

1.P SUBASH

¶23

The Court made the following:

¶24

ORDER:

¶25

This contempt case is filed for non implementation of the order dated 02.07.2020, passed by this Court in W.P.No.10648 of 2020.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions submits that order dated 02.07.2020, passed by this Court in W.P.No.10648 of 2020 has been complied with as no further instructions were received from the petitioners.

¶27

Recording the same, the contempt case is closed giving liberty to the petitioners to file an application to revive the same, if the cause still subsists. No order as to costs.

¶28

¶29

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand

closed.

JUSTICE D.RAMESH

Date:23.02.2026 GK

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH