Dismissed¶82

S Bhagya Lakshmi v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC15 Jul 2025WP/9791/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

APHC010188422023; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; Writ Petition No.9791 of 2023; decided 16/07/2025 by Ms Justice B.S. Bhanumathi; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn, no costs; pending miscellaneous applications closed; writ of mandamus; Article 226 Constitution of India; Section 151 CPC; I.A. Nos.1, 2 and 3 of 2023; interim orders dated 25.04.2023; impugned Notice Roc. 12/2020 dated 25.02.2023; Chairman, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu; G.C.C. Super Bazar; NTR Rythu Bazar; unauthorised occupation; resolution dated 28.11.2015; allotment of premises; tribal lady with disability; livelihood; Project Officer I.T.D.A. Paderu; State of Andhra Pradesh Tribal Welfare Department; counsel Eadara Peddanna; B Prakasam Senior Standing Counsel for AMC.

S Bhagya Lakshmi Vs the State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

IkV

¶2

APHC010188422023

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

\ > 0?

¶5

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶6

WEDNESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE MS JUSTICE B S BHANUMATHI

¶9

WRIT PETITION NO: 9791 OF 2023

¶10

Between:

¶11

S Bhagya Lakshmi, W/o Soban Babu aged about 35 years. Oc.Business, R/o Kindangi village and post, Paderu mandal, Alluri Sitarama Raju District.

¶12

...Petitioner

¶13

AND

¶14

The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur^Dist.

¶15

The Chairman, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu , Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶16

The Assistant Director, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu , Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶17

The Secretary, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu , Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶18

The Project Officer, LT.D.A., Paderu, Alluri Sitarama Raju Dtstrict.

¶19

...Respondents

¶20

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ or Order more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned Notice Roc. 12/2020 dt.25-02-2023 issued by the 2nd

¶21

£-■

¶22

respondent insisting to vacate the premises G.C.C. Super Bazar without jurisdiction, on the pretext of unauthorized occupation despite the said premises has been allotted in accordance with the Resolution dt.28-11-2015 by the Agriculture Market Committee, Paderu and set^asidethesame as illegal, arbitrary, irrational, and exercising the powers without jurisdiction and consequently declare that the petitioner is entitled to run and operate the above said Super Bazar without any interruption so^{astoenablehertoseek} lively hood being Tribal Lady with disability.

¶23

lA NO: 1 OF 2023

¶24

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the^{circumstancesstated} in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to continue the petitioner to run the GCC Super Bazar at NTR Rythu Bazar, Paderu by suspending the impugned Notice Roc. 12/2020 dt.25-02-2023 issued by the 2nd respondent pending disposal of the above W.P.

¶25

lA NO: 2 OF 2023

¶26

Between:

¶27

The Assistant Director, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu , Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶28

...Petitioner/Respondent

¶29

AND

¶30

S Bhagya Lakshmi, W/o Soban Babu aged about 35 years, Oc.Business, R/o Kindangi village and post, Paderu mandal, Alluri Sitarama Raju District.

¶31

The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur^Dist.

¶32

The Chairman, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶33

The Secretary, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu , Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶34

The Project Officer, I.T.D.A., Paderu, Alluri Sitarama Raju District.

¶35

...Respondents/Respondents

¶36

(R2 to R5 are not necessary parties in this petition)

¶37

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dt: 25-’04-2023 in lA.No.1/2023 in WP.No.9791/2023 and dismiss the writ petition.

¶38

lA NO: 3 OF 2023

¶39

Between:

¶40

The Chairman, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶41

The Secretary, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶42

¶43

S Bhagya Lakshmi, W/o Soban Babu aged about 35 years, Oc.Business, R/o Kindangi village and post, Paderu mandal, Alluri Sitarama Raju District.

¶44

The State Of Andhra Pradesh, rep., by its Principal Secretary, Tribal Welfare Dept Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur^Dist.

¶45

The Assistant Director, Agricultural Market Committee, Paderu Alluri Sitarama Raju Dist.

¶46

The Project Officer, I.T.D.A., Paderu, Alluri Sitarama Raju District.

¶47

Respondent/Respondents

¶48

¶49

¶50

in lA.No. 1 of 2023 in Writ Petition No.9791 of 2023 and thereby dismiss the same.

¶51

Counsel for the Petitioner: EADARA PEDDANNA

¶52

Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR SOCIAL WELFARE Counsel for the Respondent Nos.2 to 4: B PRAKASAM(Sr SC FOR AMC)

¶53

Counsel for the Respondent No.5: GP FOR AGRICULTURE

¶54

The Court made the following order:

¶55

[3311]

¶56

APHC010188422023

¶57

JN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI s .

¶58

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶59

Wednesday, the Sixteenth day of July, Two Thousand and Twenty Five

¶60

Present

¶61

The Honourable Ms.Justice B.S.Bhanumathi

¶62

Writ Petition No.9791 of 2023

Between:

S.Bhagya Lakshmi

...Petitioner

And

The State of Andhra Pradesh and others

¶68

...Respondents

¶69

Counsel for the petitioner:

¶70

I.Eadara Peddanna

¶71

Counsel for the respondents

¶72

1 .Government Pleader for Social Welfare.

¶73

2.B.Prakasam, Senior Standing Counsel for AMC

¶74

3.Government Pleader for Agriculture.

¶75

The Court made the following Order:

¶76

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed for the following relief:

¶77

“...to issue writ or order more in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the impugned notice Roc. 12/2020 dated 25.02.2023 issued by the 2'^^ respondent insisting to vacate the premises G.C.C Super Bazar without jurisdiction on the pretext of unauthorized occupation despite the said premises has been allotted in accordance with the resolution dated 28.11.2015 by the Agriculture Market Committee, Paderu and set aside the same as

¶78

¶79

BSB„J W.P.No.9791 of2023

¶80

¶81

illegal, arbitrary, irrational and exercising the powers without jurisdiction and consequently declare that the petitioner^isentitled to run and operate the above said super bazar without any interruption so as to enable her to seek lively hood^beingtribal lady with disability and pass such other or orders....”

¶82

Sri E.Peddanna, the learned counsel for the petitioner represented that the petition is withdrawn. 3. In view of the representation made on behalf of the^{petitioner,thewrit} petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

¶83

Pending miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand^closed.

¶84

Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /^CTIO FICER

¶85

To,

¶86