Dismissed¶67

Pinjari Usman v. the State of Ap

Andhra Pradesh HC7 Jul 2025WP/6636/2025

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Andhra Pradesh High Court, Amaravati; WP No. 6636 of 2025; Pinjari Usman v. State of AP, District Collector Nandyal, RDO Nandyal, Tahsildar Dhone; dispute register deletion; Survey No. 119-A3; AC 2.78 cents; Jagadurthi Village, Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District; writ of mandamus under Article 226; Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A; I.A. No. 1 of 2025 under Section 151 CPC; withdrawal letter dated 04.07.2025; permission accorded; dismissed as withdrawn without costs on 08.07.2025; Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda, J.; no merits decided; no precedent cited.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of the Writ Petition permitted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, directed to stand closed. ¶67

Pinjari Usman Vs the State of Ap — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Withdrawal of the Writ Petition permitted; Writ Petition dismissed as withdrawn with no costs; miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending, directed to stand closed.

¶67

Issue for consideration

Whether the action of the 4th respondent in keeping the petitioner's land in Survey No. 119-A3, an extent of AC 2.78 cents, at Jagadurthi Village, Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District, in the dispute register is illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and whether the petitioner is entitled to deletion of the entry and entry of his name in the revenue records (issue as raised in the petition; not adjudicated, as the petition was withdrawn).

¶18

Ratio / Principle

Permission sought by learned counsel for the petitioner to withdraw the Writ Petition is accorded.

¶50

Key takeaways

The Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with no costs.ratio¶67
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.ratio¶51

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

Writ Petition No. 6636 of 2025 (Pinjari Usman v. The State of A.P. and others), filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati, sought a writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent/Tahsildar, Dhone, in keeping the petitioner's land in Survey No. 119-A3, admeasuring AC 2.78 cents, at Jagadurthi Village, Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District, in the dispute register as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Articles 14, 19, 21 and 300A of the Constitution of India, and directing deletion of the entry and entry of the petitioner's name in the revenue records; I.A. No. 1 of 2025 under Section 151 CPC made a similar interim prayer. Before any adjudication, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a letter dated 04.07.2025 to the registry seeking permission to withdraw the writ petition. By order dated 08.07.2025, Justice Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda accorded permission, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn with no costs, and directed that miscellaneous petitions, if any, stand closed. No substantive ruling was rendered on the dispute-register grievance.

¶1

APHC010126722025

¶2

S*'B

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶4

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶5

«ft.«

¶6

TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶7

PRESENT

¶8

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 6636 OF 2025

¶9

Between:

¶10

Pinjari Usman, S/o Pinjari Bashu, Aged about 39 years, Occu Agriculture R/o H.No.5-6-2, Kothapeta, Dhone Town, Nandyal District.

¶11

...Petitioner

¶12

AND

¶13

The State of AP, rep by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Deaprtment, A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati Gunturu District.

¶14

The District Collector, Nandyal District,

¶15

The Revenue Divisional Officer, Nandyal, Nandyal^District.

¶16

The Tahsildar Dhone, Nandyal District.

¶17

...Respondents

¶18

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ or order more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 4th respondent in keeping the petitioner land in Survey No. 119-A3 an extent of AC 2.78 cents situated at Jagadurthi Village of Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District in dispute register as illegal, arbitrary and violation of Articles 14,19,21 and 300A of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 4th respondent to delete the petitioner land in survey No. 119-A3 an extent of AC 2.78 cents situated at Jagadurthi

¶19

Village of Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District from the dispute register and enter the petitioner name in the Revenue Records by receiving the line application

¶20

lA NO: 1 OF 2025

¶21

Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 4 respondent to delete the petitioner property in Survey No.119-A3 an extent of AC 2.78 cents situated at Jagadurthi Village of Dhone Mandal. Nandyal District from the dispute register and enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records by receiving the online application pending disposal of the Main WP

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI B S VENKATA RAMESH Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE

¶23

The Court made the following order:

¶24

[3329]

¶25

APHC010126722025

¶26

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶27

(Special Original Jurisdiction)