Dismissed¶32

L. Satyanarayana v. the State of Andhra Pradesh

Andhra Pradesh HC3 Jul 2025WP/4203/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Dismissal for non-prosecution; no appearance by petitioners; 'For dismissal' caption; Writ Petition No. 4203 of 2018; Article 226; writ of mandamus; AP REI Society / APREIS; Secretary AP REI Society; proceedings Rc.No.553/A1-5/2014-16 dated 17-10-2016; rejection of notional conversion into last grade service; pay scale 1375-25-1425-30-1625-40-1825-60-2375 w.e.f. 10-06-1993; G.O. Rt.No. 1413 dated 20-08-1993; WP 4103 of 1994 dated 28-11-1994; record assistant; attender; scavenger; East Godavari; Vizianagaram; Visakhapatnam; no order as to costs; pending applications closed; High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati; 04.07.2025.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. ¶32

L. Satyanarayana Vs the State of Andhra… — Writ and Judicial Review | Andhra Pradesh HC (2025)

¶1

APHC010079242018

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI

¶3

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

¶4

[3396]

¶5

FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE

¶6

PRESENT

¶7

THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 4203/2018

¶8

Between:

¶9

L. SATYANARAYANA, S/O. APPALANARASAIAH, AGE 54 YEARS OCC. RECORD ASSISTANT, O/O A.P. RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL GOKAVARAM (M), BHUPATHIPALEM EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶10

M.YEERI BABU, AGE 55 YEARS, OCC RECORD ASSISTANT MJP AP BCWR GIRLS SCHOOL , NELLIMARLA VIZIANAGARM DISTRICT

¶11

D.SURYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O SURIDAMMA, AGE 56 YEARS OCC. ATTENDER, A.P. RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (GIRLS) TUNI, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT

¶12

A.RAMANAMMA, W/O LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGE 52 YEARS OCC. SCAVENGER, A.P. RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL(BOYS) PEDDA BODDEPALLI (V), NARSIPATNAM (M) VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶13

...PETITIONER(S)

¶14

AND

¶15

THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, VICE CHAIRMAN AP REI SOCIETY(R) AMARAVATHI, A.P.

¶16

THE SECRETARY, AP REI SOCIETY, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR PAMULAPATI SIVAIAH COMPLEX NAIDUPETA, KITIPADU MAIN ROAD GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT

¶17

THE PRINCIPAL, AP RESIDENTIAL SCHOOL (BOYS) PEDDABADDEPALLI(V), NARSIPATNAM (M) VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.

¶18

...RESPONDENT(S):

¶19

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of 'Mandamus' declaring impugned orders passed by the 2nd respondent through proceedings Rc.No.553/A1-5/2014-16 dated 17-10-2016 rejecting the petitioners cases for conversion notionally into last grade service on par with the similarly situated persons as illegal, unjust, discriminative and against the principles of natural justice and set aside the proceedings Rc. No. 553/A1-5/2014-16 dated 17-10- 2016 issued by the 2nd respondent by directing the respondents to fix the pay scale of 1375-25-1425-30-162540-1825-60-2375, w.e.f. 10-06-1993 and grant increment on par with the

¶20

¶21

similarly situated employees, in terms of G.O. Rt.No. 1413 dated 20-081993 and orders of Hon'ble High Court in WP. 4103 of 1994 dated 28-111994 and pass

¶22

Counsel for the Petitioner(S):

¶23

1.NAMBI KRISHNA

¶24

Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ponakapalli ravi sc for apreis The Court made the following:

¶25

ORDER :

¶26

The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of

¶27

this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:

¶28

“ ... to issue a Writ, order or direction more in the nature of Writ of 'Mandamus' declaring impugned orders passed by the 2nd respondent through proceedings Rc.No.553/A1-5/2014-16 dated 17-10-2016 rejecting the petitioners cases for conversion notionally into last grade service on par with the similarly situated persons as illegal, unjust, discriminative and against the principles of natural justice and set aside the proceedings Rc. No. 553/A1-5/2014-16 dated 17-10- 2016 issued by the 2nd respondent by directing the respondents to fix the pay scale of 1375-25-1425-30-1625-40-1825-60-2375, w.e.f. 10-06-1993 and grant increment on par with the similarly situated employees, in terms of G.O. Rt.No. 1413 dated 20-08-1993 and orders of Hon'ble High Court in WP. 4103 of 1994 dated 28-11-1994 and pass ...”

¶29