Writ petition seeking action against a Personal Assistant to an MLA for misconduct and political activity was dismissed for non-prosecution, as neither the petitioner nor counsel appeared despite the matter being listed under the caption 'For dismissal'. No costs.
None granted; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APHC010076882018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
[3396]
FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3393/2018
Between:
...PETITIONER
AND
...RESPONDENT(S):
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents no. 1 to 3 in not taking action pursuant to petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2017 against the 4th respondent for gross misconduct and participating in political activities as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to G.O.RT.No.503, General Administration (GENL and L andC) Department, dated 06.03.2017 and contrary to Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 4th respondent including removing the 4th respondent from the post of Personal Assistant to MLA, Hindupur, Anantapur District and to pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.PONAVOLU SUDHAKARA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
2
1.P CHANDRAKANTH
2.GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING (AP)
3.GP FOR GENERAL ADMINISTRATION (AP)
The Court made the following:
ORDER :
The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of
this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief:
“ .... to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the respondents no.1 to 3 in not taking action pursuant to petitioner's representation dated 26.12.2017 against the 4th respondent for gross misconduct and participating in political activities as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, contrary to G.O.RT.No.503, General Administration (GENL and L andC) Department, dated 06.03.2017 and contrary to Andhra Pradesh Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 and consequently direct the respondents to initiate appropriate action against the 4th respondent including removing the 4th respondent from the post of Personal Assistant to MLA, Hindupur, Anantapur District and to pass ...”
represented for the Petitioner today.
order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Mjl/*
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 3393 of 2018
04.07.2025
Mjl /*
2 provisions across 2 enactments
T.M.D. Imdad
The State of Andhra Pradesh (Special Chief Secretary, GPM and AR and Coordination Department)
The State of Andhra Pradesh (Principal Secretary, Finance Department)
The District Collector, Anantapur District
V Veeriah
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
